From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Nick Dokos Subject: Re: Annoying behavior of RET after a timestamp Date: Tue, 29 May 2012 14:43:11 -0400 Message-ID: <8492.1338316991@alphaville> References: <7321.1338312260@alphaville> <7863.1338313608@alphaville> Reply-To: nicholas.dokos@hp.com Return-path: Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.92]:40526) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1SZRO1-0004w9-Ui for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Tue, 29 May 2012 14:43:22 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1SZRO0-0001uP-70 for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Tue, 29 May 2012 14:43:17 -0400 Received: from g1t0026.austin.hp.com ([15.216.28.33]:11380) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1SZRO0-0001tZ-2V for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Tue, 29 May 2012 14:43:16 -0400 In-Reply-To: Message from Samuel Wales of "Tue, 29 May 2012 10:54:04 PDT." List-Id: "General discussions about Org-mode." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sender: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org To: Samuel Wales Cc: emacs-orgmode@gnu.org Samuel Wales wrote: > FWIW, I have noticed this for a long time, actually, only worse. If > you RET after a period after link, it still thinks it's a link. And > the link followed is broken. > > IIRC. > IME, not so: I just tried RET right after a link and got a newline inserted into the buffer. I also tried pressing RET after a period inserted after the link (and also after the timestamp): in both cases, RET never tried to follow the link - it just inserted a newline. Nick