From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Eli Zaretskii <eliz@gnu.org>
Subject: bug#11700: 24.1.50; Bad interaction between BiDi and org-tables
Date: Sat, 23 Dec 2017 15:48:32 +0200
Message-ID: <83vagxk11r.fsf__20279.8876482577$1514036888$gmane$org@gnu.org>
References: <CA++fsGHi3oq-jkanE6eBV3R+Wd0phYSV6b-w61Xyk7YHjxxDyg@mail.gmail.com>
	<83mx46y4f5.fsf@gnu.org> <87mv2y6xx2.fsf@nicolasgoaziou.fr>
	<83374qxlwp.fsf@gnu.org> <877eu26wc7.fsf@nicolasgoaziou.fr>
	<83zi6twotx.fsf__4220.56812462888$1512725457$gmane$org@gnu.org>
	<87mv2trvti.fsf@nicolasgoaziou.fr> <83y3ltk1j0.fsf@gnu.org>
Reply-To: Eli Zaretskii <eliz@gnu.org>
Return-path: <emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org>
Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:36779)
	by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <Debian-debbugs@debbugs.gnu.org>) id 1eSkAl-0000xT-De
	for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Sat, 23 Dec 2017 08:49:08 -0500
Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <Debian-debbugs@debbugs.gnu.org>) id 1eSkAk-0002RI-Pc
	for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Sat, 23 Dec 2017 08:49:07 -0500
Sender: "Debbugs-submit" <debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org>
Resent-Message-ID: <handler.11700.B11700.15140369203608@debbugs.gnu.org>
In-reply-to: <83y3ltk1j0.fsf@gnu.org> (message from Eli Zaretskii on Sat, 23
	Dec 2017 15:38:11 +0200)
List-Id: "General discussions about Org-mode." <emacs-orgmode.gnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/options/emacs-orgmode>,
	<mailto:emacs-orgmode-request@gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/emacs-orgmode/>
List-Post: <mailto:emacs-orgmode@gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:emacs-orgmode-request@gnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/emacs-orgmode>,
	<mailto:emacs-orgmode-request@gnu.org?subject=subscribe>
Errors-To: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org
Sender: "Emacs-orgmode"
	<emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org>
To: mail@nicolasgoaziou.fr
Cc: dov.grobgeld@gmail.com, 11700@debbugs.gnu.org

> Date: Sat, 23 Dec 2017 15:38:11 +0200
> From: Eli Zaretskii <eliz@gnu.org>
> Cc: dov.grobgeld@gmail.com, 11700@debbugs.gnu.org
> 
> I found both methods doing well, so I'm going to show both, and let
> you decide which one is better.

On second thought, I think Method 2 is better, because it does exactly
what segment separators were invented for: to separate cells in
tables.  By contrast, the bidi formatting control characters are for
controlling the display order in general text, not necessarily in
tables.