From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Giovanni Ridolfi <giovanni.ridolfi@yahoo.it>
Subject: Re: should the mail list be splitted resp. sub-tagged ?
Date: Fri, 17 Dec 2010 15:00:41 +0100
Message-ID: <83oc8kzegm.fsf@yahoo.it>
References: <4D0B24DA.2050201@gmail.com> <91598.1292588125@iu.edu>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Return-path: <emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org>
Received: from [140.186.70.92] (port=45010 helo=eggs.gnu.org)
	by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1PTaqe-0007ZJ-8d
	for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Fri, 17 Dec 2010 08:59:53 -0500
Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <giovanni.ridolfi@yahoo.it>) id 1PTaqc-0001SX-N0
	for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Fri, 17 Dec 2010 08:59:52 -0500
Received: from nm6-vm0.bullet.mail.ukl.yahoo.com ([217.146.183.234]:23370)
	by eggs.gnu.org with smtp (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <giovanni.ridolfi@yahoo.it>) id 1PTaqc-0001SC-D4
	for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Fri, 17 Dec 2010 08:59:50 -0500
In-Reply-To: <91598.1292588125@iu.edu> (Andrew J. Korty's message of "Fri, 17
	Dec 2010 07:15:25 -0500")
List-Id: "General discussions about Org-mode." <emacs-orgmode.gnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/emacs-orgmode>,
	<mailto:emacs-orgmode-request@gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/emacs-orgmode>
List-Post: <mailto:emacs-orgmode@gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:emacs-orgmode-request@gnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/emacs-orgmode>,
	<mailto:emacs-orgmode-request@gnu.org?subject=subscribe>
Sender: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org
Errors-To: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org
To: "Andrew J. Korty" <ajk@iu.edu>
Cc: Org-mode ml <emacs-orgmode@gnu.org>

"Andrew J. Korty" <ajk@iu.edu> writes:

tags seems to be:

- [babel] [1] or [Babel] 
- [PATCH] 
- [PATCH n/m]
- [Accepted]  : means "patch accepted".
-  Bug:
- MobileOrg

acronym tags[2]:
[OT]
[RFC] 
and so on 

[1] http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/emacs-orgmode/2009-11/msg00212.html
[2] http://www.gaarde.org/acronyms/

> Torsten Wagner <torsten.wagner@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> Thinking of tags, I wonder why we use [Orgmode] since all mails
>> coming from emacs-orgmode(a)gnu.org which is a strong indicator
>> already.
>
> Not sure I agree with splitting the list, but the [Orgmode] tag is
> definitely superfluous.  Who has a mail client that can't filter on
> the List-Id field?

Come on! This is a standard for GNU project mailing lists:

[gnugo-devel] Gnugo and CGoban [3]

[coreutils] new snapshot available: coreutils-8.7.66-561f8 [4]

I think it will never change.

cheers,
Giovanni

[3] http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/gnugo-devel/2010-12/index.html
[4] http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/coreutils/2010-12/index.html