From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: "Steven E. Harris" Subject: Re: Problem with org-agenda-align-tags (patch supplied) Date: Sat, 26 Jul 2008 10:57:08 -0400 Message-ID: <838wvowv5n.fsf@torus.sehlabs.com> References: <83ej5gwvvp.fsf@torus.sehlabs.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Return-path: Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1KMlCw-0008FW-Ul for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Sat, 26 Jul 2008 10:57:18 -0400 Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1KMlCv-0008DS-BR for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Sat, 26 Jul 2008 10:57:18 -0400 Received: from [199.232.76.173] (port=41350 helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1KMlCv-0008DH-6n for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Sat, 26 Jul 2008 10:57:17 -0400 Received: from main.gmane.org ([80.91.229.2]:56255 helo=ciao.gmane.org) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS-1.0:RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:32) (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1KMlCu-0003zN-Hx for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Sat, 26 Jul 2008 10:57:16 -0400 Received: from list by ciao.gmane.org with local (Exim 4.43) id 1KMlCs-0000NQ-HC for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Sat, 26 Jul 2008 14:57:14 +0000 Received: from c-24-131-239-140.hsd1.pa.comcast.net ([24.131.239.140]) by main.gmane.org with esmtp (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Sat, 26 Jul 2008 14:57:14 +0000 Received: from seh by c-24-131-239-140.hsd1.pa.comcast.net with local (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Sat, 26 Jul 2008 14:57:14 +0000 List-Id: "General discussions about Org-mode." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org To: emacs-orgmode@gnu.org Carsten Dominik writes: > I am curious: How did you notice this, i.e. under what circumstances > does this cause a problem? When I change the state of a task using C-c C-t or C-u C-t C-t, either in an agenda view or just in one of the task trees, I see this pop up occasionally. I wonder if maybe XEmacs does more manipulation of text properties, such as turning single-item lists into atoms, or the converse, and maybe it's more fickle about what one can feed to `add-text-properties'. -- Steven E. Harris