From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Eli Zaretskii Subject: Re: Enriched/Org is a colorful Org Date: Wed, 10 Apr 2013 20:13:16 +0300 Message-ID: <834nfeb977.fsf@gnu.org> References: <87a9p79gnv.fsf@gmail.com> <20130410095450.GA31506@kuru.dyndns-at-home.com> <83a9p69x0c.fsf@gnu.org> <871uaiibel.fsf@gmail.com> Reply-To: Eli Zaretskii Return-path: Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.92]:36545) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1UPyaN-0006NP-D4 for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Wed, 10 Apr 2013 13:13:28 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1UPyaH-0001iR-7M for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Wed, 10 Apr 2013 13:13:27 -0400 Received: from mtaout22.012.net.il ([80.179.55.172]:54797) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1UPyaG-0001hk-VD for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Wed, 10 Apr 2013 13:13:21 -0400 Received: from conversion-daemon.a-mtaout22.012.net.il by a-mtaout22.012.net.il (HyperSendmail v2007.08) id <0ML100M00TXX5G00@a-mtaout22.012.net.il> for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Wed, 10 Apr 2013 20:13:02 +0300 (IDT) In-reply-to: <871uaiibel.fsf@gmail.com> List-Id: "General discussions about Org-mode." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sender: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org To: Jambunathan K Cc: emacs-orgmode@gnu.org, carsten.dominik@gmail.com > From: Jambunathan K > Cc: Carsten Dominik , emacs-orgmode@gnu.org > Date: Wed, 10 Apr 2013 22:13:46 +0530 > > Eli Zaretskii writes: > > > I beg the Org developers to please be very careful when introducing > > expensive display features such as overlays into Org. Org already > > puts the Emacs display engine to its limits in many of its popular > > features; adding overlays to this mess might be too much. > > We shouldn't be afraid of building a prototype or release the feature > with a warning "you are on your own". Fear has nothing to do with this. Good software design takes into consideration the particulars and the limitation of the infrastructure, and tries to avoid limitations and weak spots in that infrastructure. Building a house on shaky ground is silly; at best it is waste of effort. > >From Org side of things, it is the rigidity of Org syntax wrt emphasis > etc. From user side of things, an ability to color code his notes (and > possibly create an exported document that retains those highlights.) I meant technical details. The above is too high-level to be useful. > The intention is to really keep the discussion moving and see what comes > out of it. My intent was to advise people not to go in directions that can hardly be fruitful. Of course, if they want to...