From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Eli Zaretskii Subject: bug#11700: 24.1.50; Bad interaction between BiDi and org-tables Date: Mon, 04 Dec 2017 22:43:12 +0200 Message-ID: <834lp6xlzz.fsf__5891.49445663697$1512420357$gmane$org@gnu.org> References: <83mx46y4f5.fsf@gnu.org> <87mv2y6xx2.fsf@nicolasgoaziou.fr> Reply-To: Eli Zaretskii Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Return-path: Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:39551) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1eLxay-0007Dn-L5 for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Mon, 04 Dec 2017 15:44:09 -0500 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1eLxax-0005gp-QX for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Mon, 04 Dec 2017 15:44:08 -0500 Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-Message-ID: In-reply-to: (message from Dov Grobgeld on Mon, 4 Dec 2017 21:35:40 +0100) List-Id: "General discussions about Org-mode." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sender: "Emacs-orgmode" To: Dov Grobgeld Cc: mail@nicolasgoaziou.fr, 11700@debbugs.gnu.org > From: Dov Grobgeld > Date: Mon, 4 Dec 2017 21:35:40 +0100 > Cc: Eli Zaretskii , 11700@debbugs.gnu.org > > The correct Unicodeā‰„6.3 way to do this would be with the unicode isolation characters. I.e. you would wrap > each of the columns with column contents. Does emacs honor these? Yes, Emacs implements Unicode 9.0, including the UBA with isolates. However, I suspect that the results of wrapping with isolates will be different from using the original proposal of using segment separators.