From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Rasmus Pank Roulund Subject: Re: LaTeX Export Date: Thu, 12 Feb 2009 19:25:11 +0100 Message-ID: <82skmjikc8.fsf@gmail.com> References: <824p0d6i0w.fsf@gmail.com> <82tz8d4ttg.fsf@gmail.com> <66BDDF6C-A9D9-4011-9CC8-59B7AA59BFFB@uva.nl> <828wplbsdx.fsf@gmail.com> <74C94044-F04A-41D5-A3B2-1E741DE7B369@uva.nl> <823aemc95v.fsf@gmail.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Return-path: Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1LXgFV-0004pP-GW for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Thu, 12 Feb 2009 13:25:21 -0500 Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1LXgFU-0004p3-6d for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Thu, 12 Feb 2009 13:25:21 -0500 Received: from [199.232.76.173] (port=40837 helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1LXgFT-0004p0-Vt for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Thu, 12 Feb 2009 13:25:20 -0500 Received: from main.gmane.org ([80.91.229.2]:53162 helo=ciao.gmane.org) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS-1.0:RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:32) (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1LXgFT-0000DD-Gs for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Thu, 12 Feb 2009 13:25:19 -0500 Received: from list by ciao.gmane.org with local (Exim 4.43) id 1LXgFS-0005Ov-QO for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Thu, 12 Feb 2009 18:25:19 +0000 Received: from port293.ds1-aboes.adsl.cybercity.dk ([212.242.226.46]) by main.gmane.org with esmtp (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Thu, 12 Feb 2009 18:25:18 +0000 Received: from rasmus.pank by port293.ds1-aboes.adsl.cybercity.dk with local (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Thu, 12 Feb 2009 18:25:18 +0000 List-Id: "General discussions about Org-mode." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org To: emacs-orgmode@gnu.org Carsten Dominik writes: > Some time ago I added a new matcher "$1" for single > charactersbetween dollars like in this case. People who > havecustomized this option unfortunately do not get to see it. That was probably the problem. It works a lot better now! Thanks. > That said, Giovanni's proposal to use \(....\) is excellentadvice, at least > in cases where using $..$ causes trouble.- Carsten Acctually, at first I used \(...\) but at that time Org had a harder time picking up \(...\) than $...$ which caused a lot of \($...$\). I have not checked whether it works better now. Thanks, Rasmus