From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Carsten Dominik Subject: Re: Footnotes and org-export, revisited Date: Wed, 17 Dec 2008 17:08:23 +0100 Message-ID: <8244A00C-E3DC-4756-92B2-ABDA5BBB117F@uva.nl> References: <5171E67B-8472-409A-A0EE-7EA25D18D58B@uva.nl> <873agmyg4y.fsf@gmail.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v929.2) Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed; delsp=yes Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Return-path: Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1LCywp-00075A-7u for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Wed, 17 Dec 2008 11:08:31 -0500 Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1LCywm-00074Y-El for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Wed, 17 Dec 2008 11:08:30 -0500 Received: from [199.232.76.173] (port=56373 helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1LCywm-00074V-Br for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Wed, 17 Dec 2008 11:08:28 -0500 Received: from mail-ew0-f13.google.com ([209.85.219.13]:63750) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1LCywl-00040C-QC for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Wed, 17 Dec 2008 11:08:28 -0500 Received: by ewy6 with SMTP id 6so4540121ewy.18 for ; Wed, 17 Dec 2008 08:08:26 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: <873agmyg4y.fsf@gmail.com> List-Id: "General discussions about Org-mode." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org To: Paul R Cc: emacs-orgmode@gnu.org Hi Paul, I think we can easily have both, I can do the coding based on your =20 function, this is a small change. - Carsten On Dec 17, 2008, at 4:29 PM, Paul R wrote: > > Carsten> If Paul agrees, and if he has signed the papers with the FSF, > Carsten> we can integrate his code into Org-mode. > > I do agree and I do have assigned copyrights to the FSF, but from the > technical point of view I would prefer to see plain anonymous =20 > footnotes > as explained above. I might implement it myself in case everybody =20 > agrees > on it but nobody has time for it. > > Can others express their views on pros and cons of the two following > usages : > > * Usage 1, anonymous footnotes > > Karate or karate-do is a martial art developed in the Ryukyu Islands > from indigenous fighting methods and Chinese kenp=C5=8D[fn:: Kenpo is = the > name of several martial arts]. It is primarily a striking art using > punching, kicking, knee and elbow strikes and open-handed techniques > such as knife-hands and ridge-hands. > > Grappling, locks, restraints, throws, and vital point strikes are =20 > taught > in some styles. A karate practitioner is called a karateka. > > > * Usage 2, keyword named footnotes > > Karate or karate-do is a martial art developed in the Ryukyu Islands > from indigenous fighting methods and Chinese kenp=C5=8D[fn:kenpo]. It = is > primarily a striking art using punching, kicking, knee and elbow =20 > strikes > and open-handed techniques such as knife-hands and ridge-hands. > > [fn:kenpo] Kenpo is the name of several martial arts > > Grappling, locks, restraints, throws, and vital point strikes are =20 > taught > in some styles. A karate practitioner is called a karateka. > > --=20 > Paul