From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Jambunathan K <kjambunathan@gmail.com>
Subject: Re: org-html: subtree specific footnote references
Date: Tue, 10 Jul 2012 10:50:01 +0530
Message-ID: <81vchwfb0e.fsf@gmail.com>
References: <87txxjuysd.fsf@chaos.shergill.su>
	<87zk7b72dj.fsf@chaos.shergill.su> <818vess2cb.fsf@gmail.com>
	<871ukk9rla.fsf@chaos.shergill.su> <81bojogrhh.fsf@gmail.com>
	<87bojoryw9.fsf@chaos.shergill.su>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain
Return-path: <emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org>
Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.92]:42592)
	by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <kjambunathan@gmail.com>) id 1SoSrv-0001vK-JT
	for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Tue, 10 Jul 2012 01:20:16 -0400
Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <kjambunathan@gmail.com>) id 1SoSrt-0006AV-SJ
	for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Tue, 10 Jul 2012 01:20:15 -0400
Received: from mail-pb0-f41.google.com ([209.85.160.41]:63934)
	by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <kjambunathan@gmail.com>) id 1SoSrt-0006AG-Jx
	for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Tue, 10 Jul 2012 01:20:13 -0400
Received: by pbbrp2 with SMTP id rp2so23123641pbb.0
	for <emacs-orgmode@gnu.org>; Mon, 09 Jul 2012 22:20:11 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <87bojoryw9.fsf@chaos.shergill.su> (Suhail Shergill's message of
	"Tue, 10 Jul 2012 05:03:18 +0000")
List-Id: "General discussions about Org-mode." <emacs-orgmode.gnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/options/emacs-orgmode>,
	<mailto:emacs-orgmode-request@gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/emacs-orgmode>
List-Post: <mailto:emacs-orgmode@gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:emacs-orgmode-request@gnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/emacs-orgmode>,
	<mailto:emacs-orgmode-request@gnu.org?subject=subscribe>
Errors-To: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org
Sender: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org
To: Suhail Shergill <suhailshergill@gmail.com>
Cc: emacs-orgmode@gnu.org


>>>> Won't it look odd and confusing to a reader, when there are two
>>>> different footnote definitions with the same number. 
>>>
>>> yes i agree that would be very confusing. but why, pray tell, would
>>> there be two different definitions with the same number?
>>
>> <a>you haven't modified the description have you?</a>
>
> no, i haven't. also, you could look at the patch. the code is pretty
> self-explanatory.

It was not a question. It was a suggestion.

Btw, I will not be the one integrating or reviewing this patch.
--