From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Jambunathan K Subject: Re: org-html: subtree specific footnote references Date: Tue, 10 Jul 2012 11:24:48 +0530 Message-ID: <81r4skf9ef.fsf@gmail.com> References: <87txxjuysd.fsf@chaos.shergill.su> <87zk7b72dj.fsf@chaos.shergill.su> <818vess2cb.fsf@gmail.com> <871ukk9rla.fsf@chaos.shergill.su> <81bojogrhh.fsf@gmail.com> <87bojoryw9.fsf@chaos.shergill.su> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Return-path: Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.92]:41389) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1SoTPY-0001Nr-Ga for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Tue, 10 Jul 2012 01:55:01 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1SoTPW-0004l2-Nh for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Tue, 10 Jul 2012 01:55:00 -0400 Received: from mail-yx0-f169.google.com ([209.85.213.169]:63690) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1SoTPW-0004kp-HX for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Tue, 10 Jul 2012 01:54:58 -0400 Received: by yenr5 with SMTP id r5so12562841yen.0 for ; Mon, 09 Jul 2012 22:54:56 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <87bojoryw9.fsf@chaos.shergill.su> (Suhail Shergill's message of "Tue, 10 Jul 2012 05:03:18 +0000") List-Id: "General discussions about Org-mode." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sender: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org To: Suhail Shergill Cc: emacs-orgmode@gnu.org Suhail Shergill writes: > i'm talking about a scenario where for one reason or another you may > not want to do that, but may instead only want to export the most > recent subtree which has been added (since the last time it was > exported). You are trying to merge two /instances of export command/ and not two /instances of subtrees/. It only so happens that, in your specific case, you are selecting different subtrees for different export instances. What is the value of `org-footnote-section' in your case? Wrt footnotes, what you see in the Org file is not what the exporter sees. Footnote definitions get collected in to the buffer at a suitable point as part of pre-processing (see `org-footnote-normalize'). Also footnote definitions can be placed by hand at arbitrary points through out your Org file. I have a feeling that patch requires more additions. Furthermore, you also need to submit a patch to org-e-html.el which will replace org-html.el in the future. I will let the owners of org-html.el to take over from here.