From: Jambunathan K <kjambunathan@gmail.com>
To: Suhail Shergill <suhailshergill@gmail.com>
Cc: emacs-orgmode@gnu.org
Subject: Re: org-html: subtree specific footnote references
Date: Tue, 10 Jul 2012 10:08:50 +0530 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <81bojogrhh.fsf@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <871ukk9rla.fsf@chaos.shergill.su> (Suhail Shergill's message of "Tue, 10 Jul 2012 04:18:25 +0000")
Suhail Shergill <suhailshergill@gmail.com> writes:
> Jambunathan K <kjambunathan@gmail.com> writes:
>
>>>> running org-export-as-html on a subtree is currently problematic if
>>>> the result is to be merged into a document which contains html-ized
>>>> versions of other subtrees: the footnote references and definitions
>>>> get clobbered.
>>
>> Do the subtrees come from the same org file?
>
> that is the use case, yes.
Try marking the subtrees with :export: tag. Lookup the following in the
mailing list, worg or the info manual.
#+EXPORT_SELECT_TAGS: Tags that select a tree for export
#+EXPORT_EXCLUDE_TAGS: Tags that exclude a tree from export
With this, do footnotes come out along the expected lines?
>> Won't it look odd and confusing to a reader, when there are two
>> different footnote definitions with the same number.
>
> yes i agree that would be very confusing. but why, pray tell, would
> there be two different definitions with the same number?
<a>you haven't modified the description have you?</a>
>> Confusion is like to be pronounced, if the reader chooses to also print out
>> the document as a pdf or into paper.
>
> the *only* behavioural change that this effects is that the links (and backlinks
> from the definitions to references) will continue to work properly even in the
> event the user decides to merge the result of multiple subtree exports into one
> single document.
Links are visible when stuff is printed out on paper. Is it?
--
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2012-07-10 4:39 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 11+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2012-07-07 20:00 org-html: subtree specific footnote references Suhail Shergill
2012-07-07 20:16 ` Suhail Shergill
2012-07-10 3:48 ` Jambunathan K
2012-07-10 4:18 ` Suhail Shergill
2012-07-10 4:38 ` Jambunathan K [this message]
2012-07-10 5:03 ` Suhail Shergill
2012-07-10 5:20 ` Jambunathan K
2012-07-10 5:54 ` Jambunathan K
2012-07-16 17:31 ` Suhail Shergill
2012-08-02 16:26 ` Bastien
2012-08-04 0:17 ` Suhail Shergill
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
List information: https://www.orgmode.org/
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=81bojogrhh.fsf@gmail.com \
--to=kjambunathan@gmail.com \
--cc=emacs-orgmode@gnu.org \
--cc=suhailshergill@gmail.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
Code repositories for project(s) associated with this public inbox
https://git.savannah.gnu.org/cgit/emacs/org-mode.git
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).