From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Jambunathan K Subject: Re: [bug?] wiki export vs. multilines list item Date: Fri, 29 Jul 2011 17:28:40 +0530 Message-ID: <818vrhpabz.fsf@gmail.com> References: <87d3gtz6z1.fsf@walter-nb.nord-com.it> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Return-path: Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([140.186.70.92]:47977) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Qmlip-000674-5n for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Fri, 29 Jul 2011 07:59:20 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Qmlio-0006ac-46 for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Fri, 29 Jul 2011 07:59:19 -0400 Received: from plane.gmane.org ([80.91.229.3]:50204) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Qmlin-0006Xk-LZ for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Fri, 29 Jul 2011 07:59:17 -0400 Received: from public by plane.gmane.org with local (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1Qmlif-0004CK-Ca for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Fri, 29 Jul 2011 13:59:09 +0200 In-Reply-To: <87d3gtz6z1.fsf@walter-nb.nord-com.it> (Walter Franzini's message of "Fri, 29 Jul 2011 13:01:06 +0200") List-Id: "General discussions about Org-mode." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sender: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org To: Walter Franzini Cc: public-emacs-orgmode-mXXj517/zsQ@plane.gmane.org Walter Franzini writes: > Hi, > > I'm experimenting with org-mode's exporting features and I've > discovered that, with both mediawiki exporters, multilines list's > items are rendered as a list item followed by a preformatted text > block. What do you mean by "both" mediawiki exporters? >From http://orgmode.org/worg/org-faq.html ,---- | Will there ever be support for multiple lines in a table field? | | No. | | You can embed tables created with the table.el package in org-mode | buffers, with mixed success when it comes to export and publishing. `---- > Aside from editing the mediawiki markup, there is a way to fix the > behaviour of org exporters? I don't think so. Disclaimer: I am not the original author of either of the exporters. > thanks --