From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Jambunathan K Subject: Re: [ANN][RFC] org-odt.texi/org-odt.pdf preview (was Re: Org-odt table format) Date: Sun, 11 Dec 2011 04:43:11 +0530 Message-ID: <8139csf2bc.fsf@gmail.com> References: <8162jbabcv.fsf@gmail.com> <81y5w78w95.fsf_-_@gmail.com> <4EA91FC4.8000008@christianmoe.com> <81vcr9694m.fsf@gmail.com> <4EAA5DFE.10300@christianmoe.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Return-path: Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([140.186.70.92]:34278) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1RZW6e-00013C-V6 for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Sat, 10 Dec 2011 18:13:28 -0500 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1RZW6d-00076V-H7 for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Sat, 10 Dec 2011 18:13:24 -0500 Received: from mail-iy0-f169.google.com ([209.85.210.169]:52399) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1RZW6d-00076J-E6 for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Sat, 10 Dec 2011 18:13:23 -0500 Received: by iahk25 with SMTP id k25so7516201iah.0 for ; Sat, 10 Dec 2011 15:13:22 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: <4EAA5DFE.10300@christianmoe.com> (Christian Moe's message of "Fri, 28 Oct 2011 09:47:10 +0200") List-Id: "General discussions about Org-mode." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sender: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org To: mail@christianmoe.com Cc: "emacs-orgmode@gnu.org" Hello Christian Christian Moe writes: > Hi, > > Great, I'll just wait for your revised draft so we don't get versions > mixed up. You would have seen this announcement[1] by Bastien. I have checked in the revised Info documentation for ODT exporter in to the master repo. I have tried my best to act on all your inputs. Let me know what you think. [1] http://www.mail-archive.com/emacs-orgmode@gnu.org/msg49545.html > Yours, > Christian > > On 10/28/11 6:19 AM, Jambunathan K wrote: >> I will work on your suggestions and circulate a >> revised draft shortly. >> >> Once an initial org.texi gets in to the repo, improving it would be a >> breeze. > > > --