From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Jambunathan K Subject: Re: org-capture (lost PATCH?) Date: Tue, 28 Sep 2010 10:50:54 +0530 Message-ID: <811v8ev3yh.fsf@gmail.com> References: <81hbha3arh.fsf@gmail.com> <87ocbi4n41.fsf@fastmail.fm> <81d3ryv5v5.fsf@gmail.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Return-path: Received: from [140.186.70.92] (port=39571 helo=eggs.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1P0Scu-0001rB-4n for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Tue, 28 Sep 2010 01:21:17 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1P0Scs-0000Jf-MO for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Tue, 28 Sep 2010 01:21:15 -0400 Received: from mail-pz0-f41.google.com ([209.85.210.41]:53463) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1P0Scs-0000Ja-H5 for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Tue, 28 Sep 2010 01:21:14 -0400 Received: by pzk26 with SMTP id 26so3396241pzk.0 for ; Mon, 27 Sep 2010 22:21:13 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: (Carsten Dominik's message of "Tue, 28 Sep 2010 06:45:56 +0200") List-Id: "General discussions about Org-mode." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org To: Carsten Dominik Cc: Matt Lundin , emacs-orgmode@gnu.org Carsten Dominik writes: > On Sep 28, 2010, at 6:39 AM, Jambunathan K wrote: > >> Matt >> >>>> I had proposed a patch to org-capture in this thread. >>>> >>>> http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/emacs-orgmode/2010-08/ >>>> msg01152.html >>>> >>>> The patch has neither been rejected nor accepted. I am a bit >>>> concerned >>>> that it might have been lost. >>> >>> It's currently on patchwork with the status of "deferred": >>> >>> http://patchwork.newartisans.com/patch/246/ >> >> Thanks. >> >> Reassuring to know that this is still under the radar. > > No really. > > The message with the patch did state this: >> >> The intention of this mail is to share my notes and influence you to >> considering adding the needed support in the core. In effect the >> attached patch is demo-only and not to be construed as a formal >> commit request. > There was no further discussion of the patch in the mailing group, > no followup or support. ANd I have not yet spent the time to really > understand what this was all about. I was (and am) interested in feedback. I didn't make a commit request because I felt that there could be some reservations on how useful the patch could be. All I can say is that I can assure co-operation from my side. I sense that I had been a bit verbose and a bit too cautious. This seems to have turned off any further interest. A lesson for me here. I leave the table to you. Jambunathan K. > > - Carsten > > >> >> From the patchwork server side, two things could be considered: >> >> 1. Enhance the web interface[1] to show *all* *not DONE* items. >> >> - http://patchwork.newartisans.com/project/org-mode/list/ >> >> 2. Generate an automated reply to a submitter of the patch giving >> him an >> URL to the patch. This will enable under the hood access to the >> patch >> state. >> >> Either or both of 1 and 2 would avoid anxiety on contributor's side >> particularly the newer ones. >> >> Thanks, >> Jambunathan K. > > > _______________________________________________ > Emacs-orgmode mailing list > Please use `Reply All' to send replies to the list. > Emacs-orgmode@gnu.org > http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/emacs-orgmode