From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Jambunathan K <kjambunathan@gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [BUG] ORG-LIST-END-MARKER within table.el table
Date: Sat, 23 Apr 2011 00:57:05 +0530
Message-ID: <811v0uqe7q.fsf@gmail.com>
References: <81k4enebzd.fsf@gmail.com> <871v0u2zbw.fsf@gmail.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain
Return-path: <emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org>
Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([140.186.70.92]:56027)
	by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <kjambunathan@gmail.com>) id 1QDM0j-0004CD-J5
	for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Fri, 22 Apr 2011 15:27:26 -0400
Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <kjambunathan@gmail.com>) id 1QDM0i-00009n-Nl
	for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Fri, 22 Apr 2011 15:27:25 -0400
Received: from mail-pz0-f41.google.com ([209.85.210.41]:34516)
	by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <kjambunathan@gmail.com>) id 1QDM0i-00009j-JI
	for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Fri, 22 Apr 2011 15:27:24 -0400
Received: by pzk32 with SMTP id 32so657126pzk.0
	for <emacs-orgmode@gnu.org>; Fri, 22 Apr 2011 12:27:23 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <871v0u2zbw.fsf@gmail.com> (Nicolas Goaziou's message of "Fri, 22
	Apr 2011 15:24:51 +0200")
List-Id: "General discussions about Org-mode." <emacs-orgmode.gnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/options/emacs-orgmode>,
	<mailto:emacs-orgmode-request@gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: </archive/html/emacs-orgmode>
List-Post: <mailto:emacs-orgmode@gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:emacs-orgmode-request@gnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/emacs-orgmode>,
	<mailto:emacs-orgmode-request@gnu.org?subject=subscribe>
Errors-To: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org
Sender: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org
To: emacs-orgmode@gnu.org


Hello Nicolas

> Hello,
>
> Jambunathan K <kjambunathan@gmail.com> writes:
>
>> Export the following fragment to html
>>
>> * Another Table.el Table with Spanning
>>   
>>   +----------+----------+
>>   | Header 1 | Header 2 |
>>   +----------+----------+
>>   | R1 C1-2             |
>>   +----------+----------+
>>   | R2 C1    | R2-3 C2  |
>>   +          +----------+
>>   |          |          |
>>   +----------+----------+
>>
>>
>> Examine the temporary buffer that is emitted by
>> `org-export-preprocess-string'. Note that there is a ORG-LIST-END-MARKER
>> within the table.el table.
>>
>>
>> *  Another Table.el Table with Spanning 
>>   
>>   +----------+----------+
>>   | Header 1 | Header 2 |
>>   +----------+----------+
>>   | R1 C1-2             |
>>   +----------+----------+
>>   | R2 C1    | R2-3 C2  |
>>   +          +----------+
>> ORG-LIST-END-MARKER
>>   +----------+----------+
>
> This is because
>
>                         +          +----------+
>
> is recognized as a list item.
>
> But this case shouldn't happen. If you span "R2 C1" cell vertically, you
> get
>
>                         +----------+----------+
>                         | Header 1 | Header 2 |
>                         +----------+----------+
>                         | R1 C1-2             |
>                         +----------+----------+
>                         | R2 C1    | R2-3 C2  |
>                         |          +----------+
>                         |          |          |
>                         +----------+----------+
>                                     
> instead, which is correct. Did you edit table by hand?

It does look like I might have polluted a table.el table. (The table I
presented has been with me for a few months now and I don't really
recollect how I created it in the first place)

I think I need to "fix" the buggy test case. Thanks a lot for pointing
this out.

Jambunathan K.