From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Jambunathan K Subject: Re: Markdown export (using org-export-generic) Date: Thu, 18 Aug 2011 04:19:44 +0530 Message-ID: <811uwjr6uv.fsf@gmail.com> References: <811uwkzrre.fsf@gmail.com> <818vqrr7xo.fsf@gmail.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Return-path: Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([140.186.70.92]:48825) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1QtowR-0006w5-5i for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Wed, 17 Aug 2011 18:50:38 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1QtowP-0007G3-OO for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Wed, 17 Aug 2011 18:50:31 -0400 Received: from mail-pz0-f44.google.com ([209.85.210.44]:42128) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1QtowP-0007Fz-JY for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Wed, 17 Aug 2011 18:50:29 -0400 Received: by pzk36 with SMTP id 36so2197128pzk.17 for ; Wed, 17 Aug 2011 15:50:28 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <818vqrr7xo.fsf@gmail.com> (Jambunathan K.'s message of "Thu, 18 Aug 2011 03:56:27 +0530") List-Id: "General discussions about Org-mode." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sender: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org To: Paul Sexton Cc: emacs-orgmode@gnu.org > [2] Download the test.org file in the link below > http://repo.or.cz/w/org-mode/org-jambu.git/blob_plain/HEAD:/contrib/odt/tests/ The repo is refusing to a do dir listing. So here is the link to the actual file http://repo.or.cz/w/org-mode/org-jambu.git/blob_plain/HEAD:/contrib/odt/tests/test.org Side note: For prototype purposes, you can start with the headline titled "* Sample Content (Proof Of Concept)". Once that is marked as done you can proceed to headline titled "ODT Exporter". The tree under later headline is complex in the sense that it tests the export of TODO, tagged and timestamp entries. > This is the unit test file that I used for developing the exporter. It > is a GOOD starting point and should give reasonably a COMPREHENSIVE > coverage. --