Re: [Babel] Reporting 2 problems of code execution

From: "Sébastien Vauban" <wxhgmqzgwmuf-geNee64TY+gS+FvcfC7Uqw@public.gmane.org>
To: emacs-orgmode-mXXj517/zsQ@public.gmane.org
Subject: Re: [Babel] Reporting 2 problems of code execution
Date: Thu, 02 Dec 2010 20:58:05 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <80sjygt0aa.fsf@missioncriticalit.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: 878w087ykl.fsf@gmail.com

Hi Eric,

"Eric Schulte" wrote:
>> Thanks for the tip but... that may be a bit drastic, I mean forcing every
>> snippet of *every language* to behave like that:
>
> He Seb,
>
> Sorry I miss-typed, I meant the following which is exactly your
> suggestion below.
>
> #+begin_src emacs-lisp
>   (add-to-list 'org-babel-default-header-args:sh '((:results . "output")))
> #+end_src

OK. Did not know that form did already exist...

>> I feel the same about the Babel "file" property.
>> Maybe allowing such a specification line?
>>
>> #+BABEL sql: :engine mysql :cmdline -S server -U sa -P secret -d
>> storeall -n -w 700 -s " "
>
> That seems like a good suggestion, the only question seems to be what is
> the most natural syntax.
>
> I think I would lean more towards something like
>
> #+SQL_SOURCE:

I don't really care about the form. I'll let you make the best choice, the one
that best fits the whole Babel thing. Though, your proposition seems very
adequate to me...

Best regards,
  Seb

-- 
Sébastien Vauban

_______________________________________________
Emacs-orgmode mailing list
Please use `Reply All' to send replies to the list.
Emacs-orgmode-mXXj517/zsQ@public.gmane.org
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/emacs-orgmode