From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: "Sebastien Vauban" Subject: Re: [babel] BUG in :session Date: Mon, 26 Sep 2011 15:59:25 +0200 Message-ID: <80r533l802.fsf@somewhere.org> References: <4E79C82A.9000809@gmail.com> <878vpidj5d.fsf@gmail.com> <87hb45d73i.fsf@gmail.com> <80ty85hd3l.fsf@somewhere.org> <87pqitco2i.fsf@gmail.com> <87r537i6zb.fsf@gmail.com> <804o02ucpk.fsf@somewhere.org> <80r533rb5q.fsf@somewhere.org> <877h4vxzja.fsf@gmail.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Return-path: List-Id: "General discussions about Org-mode." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org-mXXj517/zsQ@public.gmane.org Sender: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org-mXXj517/zsQ@public.gmane.org To: emacs-orgmode-mXXj517/zsQ@public.gmane.org Hi Eric, Eric Schulte wrote: > "Sebastien Vauban" writes: >> Martyn Jago wrote: >>> "Sebastien Vauban" >>> writes: >>>> Loading /cygdrive/c/home/sva/src/org-mode/testing/lisp/test-ob-R.el (s= ource)... >>>> peculiar error >> >> Just git pull'ed, and re-tested: >> >> =E2=94=8F=E2=94=81=E2=94=81=E2=94=81=E2=94=81 >> =E2=94=83 Ran 111 tests, 104 results as expected, 7 unexpected (2011= -09-26 08:20:06+0200) >> =E2=94=83=20 >> =E2=94=83 7 unexpected results: >> =E2=94=83 FAILED ob-fortran/command-arguments >> =E2=94=83 FAILED ob-fortran/fortran-var-program >> =E2=94=83 FAILED ob-fortran/input-var >> =E2=94=83 FAILED ob-fortran/list-var >> =E2=94=83 FAILED ob-fortran/list-var-from-table >> =E2=94=83 FAILED ob-fortran/preprosessor-var >> =E2=94=83 FAILED ob-fortran/simple-program >> =E2=94=97=E2=94=81=E2=94=81=E2=94=81=E2=94=81 >> >> "Normal", I don't have any fortran installed. Maybe, some sort of protec= tion >> should have to be applied to these too. > > I've just improved the code which checks for executables as the previous > version was probably linux-specific. The following should now throw an > error on your system which should inhibit loading of the fortran tests. > > (org-test-for-executable "gfortran") New status: =E2=94=8F=E2=94=81=E2=94=81=E2=94=81=E2=94=81 =E2=94=83 Ran 102 tests, 102 results as expected (2011-09-26 15:54:14+0= 200) =E2=94=97=E2=94=81=E2=94=81=E2=94=81=E2=94=81 Perfect... >>>> This is on Windows XP SP3, with a Cygwin Emacs (when run from terminal; >>>> otherwise, it is a Win32 binary from the FSF). >>> >>> Its really great to hear you are running the tests on Windows. At some >>> point I hope to test with the EmacsW32 port. >> >> I can do it as well. I should automate this -- not difficult, though. >> >> If there is some shared place to place such results, I can imagine runni= ng >> them every couple of hours (cron'ed), or so, and publish the resulting H= TML. I >> could do this when being online, that is more or less half of the time. > > This sounds great. I agree that a public place to post results would be > useful. Also, while we don't have any HTML export right now, simply > redirecting the results of the test execution to a file should be > sufficient. We can put such in place. For Windows tests, it could be someone else, if someone promises to be 24/7 online -- what won't be my case. Otherwise, I'm willing to do it, simply know that there will be holes in the update of the results. Best regards, Seb --=20 Sebastien Vauban