From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: "Sebastien Vauban" Subject: Re: Visibilty of inline tasks Date: Mon, 06 Feb 2012 21:34:28 +0100 Message-ID: <80r4y7r99n.fsf@somewhere.org> References: <80d3p17ss3.fsf@missioncriticalit.com> <4F3028B4.9090306@online.de> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Return-path: List-Id: "General discussions about Org-mode." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org-mXXj517/zsQ@public.gmane.org Sender: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org-mXXj517/zsQ@public.gmane.org To: emacs-orgmode-mXXj517/zsQ@public.gmane.org Hi Marc-Oliver, Marc-Oliver Ihm wrote: > Am 16.12.2010 14:26, schrieb S=C3=A9bastien Vauban: >> Though that is written in =3Dorg-inlinetask.el=3D: >> >> ;; Visibility cycling exempts these nodes from cycling. So whenever the= ir >> ;; parent is opened, so are these tasks. >> >> I have the impression that, up to a couple of days ago, the inlined head= lines >> were showed in the =3Dchildren=3D view, such as: >> >> --8<---------------cut here---------------start------------->8--- >> * TODO Write document >> ** TODO Write intro >> ** TODO Write code >> *************** WAIT Ask the client about specs >> ** TODO Write conclusion >> --8<---------------cut here---------------end--------------->8--- >> >> Am I right? >> >> - If yes, could it be back like that? >> - If no, would others as well be interested in such a behavior? > > as far as I can see, Sebastien description still applies. This behaviour > (bug ?) makes it hard to work with inline-tasks (which I do alot), because > once I open the topmost node, all subheadings with any inline task are > opened too, regardless how depp they are nested. This makes it nearly > impossible to get an overview about the contents of the node. > > So: This problem still seems to be around. What I described was the impression that: - before December, inline tasks were shown when TAB'ing - at some point in December, they were not anymore. That's wrong. And I had mixed impressions because I saw them when C-c / t'ing for tasks inside a document. In fact, I share your point of view: as they don't participate to document structure (that's why they're inline tasks), they should not be made visible when cycling. That's not the current behavior. Best regards, Seb --=20 Sebastien Vauban