Re: [Babel] Need for an extra literal block construct

From: "Sébastien Vauban" <wxhgmqzgwmuf-geNee64TY+gS+FvcfC7Uqw@public.gmane.org>
To: emacs-orgmode-mXXj517/zsQ@public.gmane.org
Subject: Re: [Babel] Need for an extra literal block construct
Date: Fri, 19 Nov 2010 23:02:54 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <80pqu12cq9.fsf@missioncriticalit.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: 5EA8D257-9B3A-428D-8842-476EC832FCE3@tsdye.com

Hi Thomas,

"Thomas S. Dye" wrote:
> On Nov 19, 2010, at 10:26 AM, Sébastien Vauban wrote:
>> *Same for PDF*: the lists in the VERSE environment are interpreted:
>>
>> --8<---------------cut here---------------start------------->8---
>> \begin{verse}
>>>> Does it work?\\
>>> \\
>>> Yes, if you:\\
>>> - update \url{this-var}\\
>>> - restart\\
>> \vspace*{1em}
>> OK. Confirmed, but you need to:\\
>> \begin{enumerate}
>> \item delete the \url{cache}.\\
>> \item redo it.\\
>> \end{enumerate}
>>
>> \vspace*{1em}
>> Thanks to:\\
>> \begin{itemize}
>> \item you\\
>> \item me\\
>> \end{itemize}
>>
>> \end{verse}
>> --8<---------------cut here---------------end--------------->8---
>
> Just a side comment on the LaTeX output of your example: it is usually not a
> good idea to put markup like \vspace in the .tex file. Commands like \vspace
> work there, but they defeat the document design of the style or class file.
> In the ideal case, commands like \vspace are confined to style and class
> files and do not appear in tex files.
>
> Perhaps the \vspace could be eliminated on the way to squashing your bug?

Just to be sure we talk of the same thing, the \vspace is not introduced by
me. It's something automatically inserted in the TeX during the VERSE
conversion.

I think it's clear to you, but let's state it clearly...

Best regards,
  Seb

-- 
Sébastien Vauban

_______________________________________________
Emacs-orgmode mailing list
Please use `Reply All' to send replies to the list.
Emacs-orgmode-mXXj517/zsQ@public.gmane.org
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/emacs-orgmode