* [Bug] Verbatim code gets interpreted
@ 2011-03-07 8:06 Sébastien Vauban
2011-03-07 15:30 ` Bastien
0 siblings, 1 reply; 3+ messages in thread
From: Sébastien Vauban @ 2011-03-07 8:06 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: emacs-orgmode-mXXj517/zsQ
Hi,
When trying to put some JS code in an Org file (to be published), I did it
that way:
#+begin_html
<div id="disqus_thread"></div>
<script type="text/javascript">
(function() {
var dsq = document.createElement('script'); dsq.type = 'text/javascript'; dsq.async = true;
dsq.src = 'http://' + disqus_shortname + '.disqus.com/embed.js';
(document.getElementsByTagName('head')[0] || document.getElementsByTagName('body')[0]).appendChild(dsq);
})();
</script>
#+end_html
But the [0] gets interpreted as a footnote... which is not found, hence an
error on the page, and the JS code is not usable.
The workaround is really easy for now:
#+HTML:<div id="disqus_thread"></div>
#+HTML:<script type="text/javascript">
#+HTML: (function() {
#+HTML: var dsq = document.createElement('script'); dsq.type = 'text/javascript'; dsq.async = true;
#+HTML: dsq.src = 'http://' + disqus_shortname + '.disqus.com/embed.js';
#+HTML: (document.getElementsByTagName('head')[0] || document.getElementsByTagName('body')[0]).appendChild(dsq);
#+HTML: })();
#+HTML:</script>
But I wanted to report this finding.
Best regards,
Seb
--
Sébastien Vauban
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread* Re: [Bug] Verbatim code gets interpreted
2011-03-07 8:06 [Bug] Verbatim code gets interpreted Sébastien Vauban
@ 2011-03-07 15:30 ` Bastien
2011-03-08 16:02 ` Sébastien Vauban
0 siblings, 1 reply; 3+ messages in thread
From: Bastien @ 2011-03-07 15:30 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Sébastien Vauban; +Cc: emacs-orgmode
Hi Sébastien,
Sébastien Vauban <wxhgmqzgwmuf@spammotel.com> writes:
> #+begin_html
> <div id="disqus_thread"></div>
> <script type="text/javascript">
> (function() {
> var dsq = document.createElement('script'); dsq.type = 'text/javascript'; dsq.async = true;
> dsq.src = 'http://' + disqus_shortname + '.disqus.com/embed.js';
> (document.getElementsByTagName('head')[0] || document.getElementsByTagName('body')[0]).appendChild(dsq);
> })();
> </script>
> #+end_html
>
> But the [0] gets interpreted as a footnote... which is not found, hence an
> error on the page, and the JS code is not usable.
>
> [...]
>
> But I wanted to report this finding.
Thanks for reporting this. I think we could rewrite the export
preprocess function to allow export parameters to be added:
,----
| #+begin_html ^:nil
| ...
| #+end_html
`----
In such a block, the ^:nil option would take precedence over the
possibly ^:t option in the buffer. I'll have a look into this for
the next release.
Best,
--
Bastien
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread* Re: [Bug] Verbatim code gets interpreted
2011-03-07 15:30 ` Bastien
@ 2011-03-08 16:02 ` Sébastien Vauban
0 siblings, 0 replies; 3+ messages in thread
From: Sébastien Vauban @ 2011-03-08 16:02 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: emacs-orgmode-mXXj517/zsQ
Hi Bastien,
> Sébastien Vauban <wxhgmqzgwmuf-geNee64TY+gS+FvcfC7Uqw@public.gmane.org> writes:
>
>> #+begin_html
>> <div id="disqus_thread"></div>
>> <script type="text/javascript">
>> (function() {
>> var dsq = document.createElement('script'); dsq.type = 'text/javascript'; dsq.async = true;
>> dsq.src = 'http://' + disqus_shortname + '.disqus.com/embed.js';
>> (document.getElementsByTagName('head')[0] || document.getElementsByTagName('body')[0]).appendChild(dsq);
>> })();
>> </script>
>> #+end_html
>>
>> But the [0] gets interpreted as a footnote... which is not found, hence an
>> error on the page, and the JS code is not usable.
>>
>> [...]
>>
>> But I wanted to report this finding.
>
> Thanks for reporting this. I think we could rewrite the export preprocess
> function to allow export parameters to be added:
>
> ,----
> | #+begin_html ^:nil
> | ...
> | #+end_html
> `----
>
> In such a block, the ^:nil option would take precedence over the possibly
> ^:t option in the buffer. I'll have a look into this for the next release.
Such a behavior is OK for me (as who can do more can do less), but I wonder
why we simply don't treat the block between `#+begin/end_html' as verbatim,
without touching it at all?
Couldn't one do the same as what happens for the lines prefixed by `#+HTML'?
Best regards,
Seb
--
Sébastien Vauban
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2011-03-08 16:02 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 3+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2011-03-07 8:06 [Bug] Verbatim code gets interpreted Sébastien Vauban
2011-03-07 15:30 ` Bastien
2011-03-08 16:02 ` Sébastien Vauban
Code repositories for project(s) associated with this public inbox
https://git.savannah.gnu.org/cgit/emacs/org-mode.git
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).