Hello, I am currently unable to produce an agenda from my files. This bug crept in somewhere in the last few days, but I'm not sure exactly when. This habit timestamp: SCHEDULED: <2012-08-08 Wed .+1d> Produces this error: condition-case: Bad timestamp `habit' at 210773 in buffer `Writing.org' Error was: (Not a standard Org-mode time string: habit) It works if I use the min/max format (<2012-08-08 Wed .+1d/2d>), but I don't want to do that, and according to the manual, that isn't required. Also, in this bug report data, I wonder why org-loaddefs.el can not be found. I run the org from a git repo, not compiled. Emacs : GNU Emacs 24.2.50.1 (i686-pc-linux-gnu, GTK+ Version 3.4.2) of 2012-09-28 on louvi, modified by Debian Package: Org-mode version 7.9.2 (release_7.9.2-383-g09d6bc-git @ org-loaddefs.el can not be found!) If no one else sees this, I'll dig through my files to see what's broken, but I see lots of work has been done to the agenda creator recently, and maybe this is a new problem and an easy fix. Best, Terry -- T.F. Torrey
On 10/02/2012 05:05 PM, T.F. Torrey wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I am currently unable to produce an agenda from my files. This bug
> crept in somewhere in the last few days, but I'm not sure exactly when.
>
> This habit timestamp:
>
> SCHEDULED: <2012-08-08 Wed .+1d>
>
> Produces this error:
>
> condition-case: Bad timestamp `habit' at 210773 in buffer `Writing.org'
> Error was: (Not a standard Org-mode time string: habit)
>
> It works if I use the min/max format (<2012-08-08 Wed .+1d/2d>), but I
> don't want to do that, and according to the manual, that isn't required.
>
> Also, in this bug report data, I wonder why org-loaddefs.el can not be
> found. I run the org from a git repo, not compiled.
>
> Emacs : GNU Emacs 24.2.50.1 (i686-pc-linux-gnu, GTK+ Version 3.4.2) of
> 2012-09-28 on louvi, modified by Debian Package: Org-mode version 7.9.2
> (release_7.9.2-383-g09d6bc-git @ org-loaddefs.el can not be found!)
>
> If no one else sees this, I'll dig through my files to see what's
> broken, but I see lots of work has been done to the agenda creator
> recently, and maybe this is a new problem and an easy fix.
>
> Best,
> Terry
>
Same problem here: GNU Emacs 24.2.1 Org-mode version 7.9.2
(release_7.9.2-382-g1ef9ee)
I pull nightly and first noticed this behavior today.
-Bill
Hi, Bill Jacobson wrote: > On 10/02/2012 05:05 PM, T.F. Torrey wrote: >> I am currently unable to produce an agenda from my files. This bug >> crept in somewhere in the last few days, but I'm not sure exactly when. >> >> This habit timestamp: >> >> SCHEDULED: <2012-08-08 Wed .+1d> For the sake of accuracy, this ain't an habit, this is a repeater -- IIUC. >> Produces this error: >> >> condition-case: Bad timestamp `habit' at 210773 in buffer `Writing.org' >> Error was: (Not a standard Org-mode time string: habit) >> >> It works if I use the min/max format (<2012-08-08 Wed .+1d/2d>), but I >> don't want to do that, and according to the manual, that isn't required. That's an habit for me: when you specify min/max, as you do here. >> Also, in this bug report data, I wonder why org-loaddefs.el can not be >> found. I run the org from a git repo, not compiled. >> >> Emacs : GNU Emacs 24.2.50.1 (i686-pc-linux-gnu, GTK+ Version 3.4.2) of >> 2012-09-28 on louvi, modified by Debian Package: Org-mode version 7.9.2 >> (release_7.9.2-383-g09d6bc-git @ org-loaddefs.el can not be found!) >> >> If no one else sees this, I'll dig through my files to see what's >> broken, but I see lots of work has been done to the agenda creator >> recently, and maybe this is a new problem and an easy fix. > > Same problem here: GNU Emacs 24.2.1 Org-mode version 7.9.2 > (release_7.9.2-382-g1ef9ee) > > I pull nightly and first noticed this behavior today. I also have a similar problem since yesterday morning or so: such timestamped dates (I mean: *repeaters*, SCHEDULED or not) are visible everyday of my agenda, while most of them should only be visible once a week: --8<---------------cut here---------------start------------->8--- ** Review my tasks and projects <2011-01-07 Fri 14:00-16:00 +1w> --8<---------------cut here---------------end--------------->8--- Best regards, Seb -- Sebastien Vauban
Hi,
tftorrey@tftorrey.com (T.F. Torrey) writes:
> I am currently unable to produce an agenda from my files. This bug
> crept in somewhere in the last few days, but I'm not sure exactly
> when.
This is now fixed, thanks.
--
Bastien
Hi Bastien,
Bastien wrote:
> tftorrey-qbg7uNF1nfdWk0Htik3J/w@public.gmane.org (T.F. Torrey) writes:
>> I am currently unable to produce an agenda from my files. This bug
>> crept in somewhere in the last few days, but I'm not sure exactly
>> when.
>
> This is now fixed, thanks.
Confirmed OK. Thanks!
It may be unrelated, but (with the latest pull) I now have a warning in some
batch commands which I use to export agenda views:
--8<---------------cut here---------------start------------->8---
emacs -Q -batch -l org-agenda-views.el -eval '(org-agenda nil "e")'
Warning: Lisp directory `C:/Program Files/emacs-24.1/../site-lisp' does not exist.
OVERVIEW
Loading vc-svn...
Saving file d:/home/sva/org-all-tasks.html...
--8<---------------cut here---------------end--------------->8---
I don't see where that warning is generated in the Org sources.
Worth mentioning?
Best regards,
Seb
--
Sebastien Vauban
Hi Sébastien,
"Sebastien Vauban"
<wxhgmqzgwmuf-geNee64TY+gS+FvcfC7Uqw@public.gmane.org> writes:
> emacs -Q -batch -l org-agenda-views.el -eval '(org-agenda nil "e")'
> Warning: Lisp directory `C:/Program Files/emacs-24.1/../site-lisp' does not exist.
Maybe a warning due to the bad commits I pushed wrt the build system.
Please pull again and report if the warning still exists.
Thanks!
--
Bastien
Hi Bastien,
Bastien wrote:
> "Sebastien Vauban" writes:
>
>> emacs -Q -batch -l org-agenda-views.el -eval '(org-agenda nil "e")'
>> Warning: Lisp directory `C:/Program Files/emacs-24.1/../site-lisp' does not exist.
>
> Maybe a warning due to the bad commits I pushed wrt the build system.
>
> Please pull again and report if the warning still exists.
Yes, it is.
Though, I don't have time right now to collect more details. As long as it is
just as warning, I'll keep living with it until I free some time -- or until I
discover bad effects!
Best regards,
Seb
--
Sebastien Vauban
Sebastien Vauban writes: > Yes, it is. This is strange, as the current Org does not appear to contain anything that would give rise to this. Maybe something in your setup or configuration? Regards, Achim. -- +<[Q+ Matrix-12 WAVE#46+305 Neuron microQkb Andromeda XTk Blofeld]>+ SD adaptation for Waldorf microQ V2.22R2: http://Synth.Stromeko.net/Downloads.html#WaldorfSDada