From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: =?utf-8?Q?S=C3=A9bastien_Vauban?= Subject: Re: Release 7.02 Date: Fri, 29 Oct 2010 13:36:38 +0200 Message-ID: <80eib9p6wp.fsf@mundaneum.com> References: <912EC325-B17E-487B-BA7F-47573F8D4D69@gmail.com> <80tyk5pfih.fsf@mundaneum.com> <41829F98-B0DD-4FDB-981D-36DBECD53862@gmail.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Return-path: List-Id: "General discussions about Org-mode." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org-mXXj517/zsQ@public.gmane.org Errors-To: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org-mXXj517/zsQ@public.gmane.org To: emacs-orgmode-mXXj517/zsQ@public.gmane.org Hi Carsten, Carsten Dominik wrote: > On Oct 29, 2010, at 10:30 AM, S=C3=A9bastien Vauban wrote: >> Carsten Dominik wrote: >>> Due to changes made to lists, it is no longer possible to have a sublis= t, >>> some text and then another sublist while still in the same top- level l= ist >>> item, like in the following situation: >>> >>> - Some list >>> + A first sublist >>> + of two elements >>> >>> A text belonging to the top-level list >>> >>> + Then another sublist >>> + and a second element in it >>> - End of main list >> >> Basically, it means that this entry for this entry (about Org Babel) from >> an old file of mine (update this morning) does not publish anymore the s= ame >> way: >> >> --8<---------------cut here---------------start------------->8--- >> * How to view the results >> >> - =3DC-c C-v C-v=3D (or =3DC-c C-v v=3D) -- View the expanded body of a = code block. >> >> - =3DC-c C-v C-z=3D -- Switch to the *session* of the current code block= (first, >> you need to add =3D:session=3D to it). >> >> Use =3DC-u C-c C-v C-z=3D to bring up the session with the input variab= le >> pre-loaded. >> >> =3DC-c C-v z=3D (=3Dorg-babel-switch-to-session-with-code=3D) is a vari= ant of =3DC-c >> C-v C-z=3D (=3Dorg-babel-switch-to-session=3D): instead of switching to= the >> session buffer, it splits the window between: >> >> + the session buffer, and >> + a language major-mode edit buffer for the code block in question. >> >> This can be convenient for using language major mode for interacting wi= th >> the session buffer. >> --8<---------------cut here---------------end--------------->8--- >> >> The last sentence is *not* considered part of the second element of the >> first list. >> >> Although I've seen similar constructs in many, many documents, does anyo= ne >> know enough rules of style to tell me if this is a wrong way to write >> things down? Or, does some possibility still exist to support this >> seamlessly? > > It is not that this would be bad style. In fact I do miss this kind of > structure as well, and accepting loosing it was the biggest argument agai= nst > Nicolas' change. Does that mean that we must admit this will stay like that forever, or will one try to look and see if it's possible to make that extension? > However, the trade was for much greater stability and consistency of plain > lists, Nicolas has done some great work here. Another issue was that the > LaTeX exporter never had any support for these structures, so that was > inconsistent for a long time. I know that Bastien told he would fix it when he would have time. So, that = did not seem to be an impossible wish. Best regards, Seb --=20 S=C3=A9bastien Vauban _______________________________________________ Emacs-orgmode mailing list Please use `Reply All' to send replies to the list. Emacs-orgmode-mXXj517/zsQ@public.gmane.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/emacs-orgmode