From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: =?utf-8?Q?S=C3=A9bastien_Vauban?= Subject: RFI -- Which completion system? Date: Thu, 21 Oct 2010 23:16:19 +0200 Message-ID: <80d3r3457g.fsf@mundaneum.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Return-path: List-Id: "General discussions about Org-mode." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org-mXXj517/zsQ@public.gmane.org Errors-To: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org-mXXj517/zsQ@public.gmane.org To: emacs-orgmode-mXXj517/zsQ@public.gmane.org Hello, Before spending a lot of time trying to choose for the "best" completion mechanism inside Emacs (and sticking to it), setting it up all the way through, I wanted to know if you had had: - particularly good or bad experiences with one of the "standard" ones? - things to notice regarding the integration with Org? >From the many that do exist -- and which conflict in my =3D.emacs=3D file! = --, I've spotted the following ones of being of real interest: - dabbrev - hippie-expand - pabbrev - company Any comment on this? Best regards, Seb --=20 S=C3=A9bastien Vauban _______________________________________________ Emacs-orgmode mailing list Please use `Reply All' to send replies to the list. Emacs-orgmode-mXXj517/zsQ@public.gmane.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/emacs-orgmode