From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: "Sebastien Vauban" Subject: Re: Suggestion: Replace #+SETUP_FILE with #+INCLUDE Date: Thu, 11 Oct 2012 09:51:46 +0200 Message-ID: <804nm1tpil.fsf@somewhere.org> References: <87a9vu5y2e.fsf@gmail.com> <86sj9m19vg.fsf@mercure.progiciels-bpi.ca> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Return-path: List-Id: "General discussions about Org-mode." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org-mXXj517/zsQ@public.gmane.org Sender: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org-mXXj517/zsQ@public.gmane.org To: emacs-orgmode-mXXj517/zsQ@public.gmane.org Hello Nicolas, Fran=C3=A7ois Pinard wrote: > Nicolas Goaziou writes: > >> Therefore, I don't see any reason to keep maintaining the #+SETUP_FILE >> keyword. I'd rather remove it and suggest to use #+INCLUDE: keyword >> instead. Any objection? > > None really. I use both and distinguish them in some validation tool, > which I would happily and easily adapt! :-) Fine with me. This makes a lot of sense, when they don't differ that much, = and when we don't know exactly which one to use in which context (=3D my view). Best regards, Seb --=20 Sebastien Vauban