From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: "Sebastien Vauban" Subject: Re: Selectively export RESULTS Date: Sun, 04 Mar 2012 21:44:32 +0100 Message-ID: <801up86qq7.fsf@somewhere.org> References: <87ty2aw7ps.fsf@tajo.ucsd.edu> <87ty29eg8n.fsf@tajo.ucsd.edu> <87boohbmch.fsf@gmx.com> <8762epz8uh.fsf@tajo.ucsd.edu> <87mx7ynbbm.fsf@gmx.com> <87399qn6ft.fsf@gmx.com> <4F5129B9.2070800@isciences.com> <87hay6lpey.fsf@gmx.com> <80wr72dkx3.fsf@somewhere.org> <87obsdpwhw.fsf@Rainer.invalid> <80k431e1b7.fsf@somewhere.org> <87lingveh0.fsf@Rainer.invalid> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Return-path: List-Id: "General discussions about Org-mode." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org-mXXj517/zsQ@public.gmane.org Sender: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org-mXXj517/zsQ@public.gmane.org To: emacs-orgmode-mXXj517/zsQ@public.gmane.org Hi Achim, Achim Gratz wrote: > "Sebastien Vauban" writes: >> Not sure to understand why you would prefer to have something that you just >> wrote not taken into account, unlike one would expect? > > Because I might not have finished editing that part and just moving the > cursor away from that line doesn't mean it should be acted upon. I dislike > any software that makes guesses as to when I might have finished something > or worse, tries to act upon my change _while I change it_ (that's especially > bad if the things it does take a long time or produce errors that I have to > deal with). I certainly never said that the "automagic C-c C-c" should be done after each key press or some such. That certainly would be a killer feature, in its real acception: performance would be unbearable. In my mind, automatically (re-)parsing the meta options should be each time the user presses `C-c C-v C-e' (eval code blocks); that is, when the user expects his options to be taken into account. I guess this makes much sense, but... Best regards, Seb -- Sebastien Vauban