From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Carsten Dominik Subject: Re: org priority cycling - removing priorities Date: Fri, 7 Sep 2007 10:04:23 +0200 Message-ID: <7fa8cbf49995c5cb1dbd0ff46f6cd81d@science.uva.nl> References: <46E00294.6020403@calicojack.co.uk> Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v624) Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1ITYpF-0006QY-Kh for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Fri, 07 Sep 2007 04:04:25 -0400 Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1ITYpE-0006Pl-W3 for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Fri, 07 Sep 2007 04:04:25 -0400 Received: from [199.232.76.173] (helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1ITYpE-0006PM-Nu for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Fri, 07 Sep 2007 04:04:24 -0400 Received: from korteweg.uva.nl ([146.50.98.70]) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1ITYpE-0002mF-6w for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Fri, 07 Sep 2007 04:04:24 -0400 In-Reply-To: <46E00294.6020403@calicojack.co.uk> List-Id: "General discussions about Org-mode." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org To: Rick Moynihan Cc: emacs-orgmode On Sep 6, 2007, at 15:37, Rick Moynihan wrote: > Every now and then I find myself mispressing SHIFT-up/SHIFT-down on an > outline and assigning a priority to it. This then often leads me to > navigating the point to the priority to delete it manually. > > It would be great if SHIFT-up/SHIFT-down would cycle through: > > [#A] > [#B] > [#C] > _ - blank (i.e. no priority). > > This way I could easily undo the operation with the same keys. Is > there any good reason not to have this behaviour? Don't know how good this reason is, but here it is: The default priority is #B. If you press S-up on an entry without priority, it will switch immediately to #A. Similarly, S-down will go immediately to #C. If I were to include the empty state in the cycling, S-up would go #A -> nil #A -> nil But as I said, this may not be good enough a reason. Open for discussion. - Carsten