From: Carsten Dominik <dominik@science.uva.nl>
To: Rick Moynihan <rick@calicojack.co.uk>
Cc: emacs-orgmode <emacs-orgmode@gnu.org>
Subject: Re: org priority cycling - removing priorities
Date: Fri, 7 Sep 2007 10:04:23 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <7fa8cbf49995c5cb1dbd0ff46f6cd81d@science.uva.nl> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <46E00294.6020403@calicojack.co.uk>
On Sep 6, 2007, at 15:37, Rick Moynihan wrote:
> Every now and then I find myself mispressing SHIFT-up/SHIFT-down on an
> outline and assigning a priority to it. This then often leads me to
> navigating the point to the priority to delete it manually.
>
> It would be great if SHIFT-up/SHIFT-down would cycle through:
>
> [#A]
> [#B]
> [#C]
> _ - blank (i.e. no priority).
>
> This way I could easily undo the operation with the same keys. Is
> there any good reason not to have this behaviour?
Don't know how good this reason is, but here it is:
The default priority is #B. If you press S-up on an entry without
priority, it
will switch immediately to #A. Similarly, S-down will go immediately
to #C.
If I were to include the empty state in the cycling, S-up would go
#A -> nil #A -> nil
But as I said, this may not be good enough a reason. Open for
discussion.
- Carsten
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2007-09-07 8:04 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 17+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2007-09-06 13:37 org priority cycling - removing priorities Rick Moynihan
2007-09-06 14:25 ` William Henney
2007-09-07 8:04 ` Carsten Dominik [this message]
2007-09-09 14:30 ` Numeric Priorities (Was: Re: org priority cycling - removing priorities) Nuutti Kotivuori
2007-09-13 5:25 ` Carsten Dominik
2007-09-24 9:14 ` Dmitri Minaev
2007-09-24 9:19 ` Numeric Priorities Bastien
2007-09-24 9:50 ` Dmitri Minaev
2007-09-24 11:00 ` Bastien
2007-09-24 11:17 ` Dmitri Minaev
2007-09-24 13:28 ` Bastien
2007-09-24 11:02 ` Nuutti Kotivuori
2007-09-24 11:44 ` Carsten Dominik
2007-09-27 12:36 ` Dmitri Minaev
2007-09-07 9:08 ` org priority cycling - removing priorities Dmitri Minaev
2007-09-07 14:00 ` Renzo Been
2007-09-10 1:00 ` Xavier Maillard
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
List information: https://www.orgmode.org/
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=7fa8cbf49995c5cb1dbd0ff46f6cd81d@science.uva.nl \
--to=dominik@science.uva.nl \
--cc=emacs-orgmode@gnu.org \
--cc=rick@calicojack.co.uk \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
Code repositories for project(s) associated with this public inbox
https://git.savannah.gnu.org/cgit/emacs/org-mode.git
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).