From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: "Alan E. Davis" Subject: Re: Change line spacing for lists for LaTeX export Date: Fri, 19 Jun 2009 08:19:36 +1000 Message-ID: <7bef1f890906181519s7ab0c0a8wa5e52f94d64512a6@mail.gmail.com> References: <7bef1f890906181502p5557aae7o447b651729a2dacd@mail.gmail.com> <7bef1f890906181518v458ef9bboa8057500f51b3170@mail.gmail.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="===============0961236983==" Return-path: Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1MHPxi-0007rY-7Z for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Thu, 18 Jun 2009 18:20:02 -0400 Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1MHPxd-0007kH-FN for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Thu, 18 Jun 2009 18:20:01 -0400 Received: from [199.232.76.173] (port=40195 helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1MHPxd-0007k4-BQ for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Thu, 18 Jun 2009 18:19:57 -0400 Received: from mail-pz0-f198.google.com ([209.85.222.198]:44695) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1MHPxc-0006g7-Ul for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Thu, 18 Jun 2009 18:19:57 -0400 Received: by pzk36 with SMTP id 36so464906pzk.14 for ; Thu, 18 Jun 2009 15:19:56 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <7bef1f890906181518v458ef9bboa8057500f51b3170@mail.gmail.com> List-Id: "General discussions about Org-mode." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org To: org-mode --===============0961236983== Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=001636e0b39cc2a951046ca6ce68 --001636e0b39cc2a951046ca6ce68 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit I had used the following: #+LATEX_HEADER:\addtolength{\itemsep}{-4pt} and, previously: #+LATEX_HEADER:\setlength{\itemsep}{1pt} Neither of them makes a difference. Alan On Fri, Jun 19, 2009 at 8:18 AM, Alan E. Davis wrote: > I can see now that the LaTeX source for my outline is not in list form, but > in sections. When I reformat to use list notation in org, the following do > not change anything in the pdf that is output. Interestingly, when I export > LaTeX into a buffer latex then complains about too many nested levels, while > the pdf is exported ok. > > Perhaps there is another length parameter I can change to make the outlines > based on sectioning more compact. > > > Alan > > "Pollution is nothing but the resources we are not harvesting. We allow > them to disperse because we've been ignorant of their value." > --- Buckminster Fuller > > > > On Fri, Jun 19, 2009 at 8:02 AM, Alan E. Davis wrote: > >> I need to print outlines in a more compact form than LaTeX lists >> ordinarily provide. I often have used the paralist package, although it >> conflicts with some other packages. How can I alter the line spacing for >> the lists directly, for export? >> >> I found this suggestion, and I was going to use #+LATEX_HEADER:, but then >> it occured to me that I don't have a way to specifiy that "my_enumerate" >> would be used instead of "enumerate". >> >> This is the code I found on line: >> >> % >> % this makes list spacing much better. >> % >> \newenvironment{my_enumerate}{ >> \begin{enumerate} >> \setlength{\itemsep}{1pt} >> \setlength{\parskip}{0pt} >> \setlength{\parsep}{0pt}}{\end{enumerate} >> >> >> >> } >> >> Thank you for any suggestions. >> >> >> Alan Davis >> >> "Pollution is nothing but the resources we are not harvesting. We allow >> them to disperse because we've been ignorant of their value." >> --- Buckminster Fuller >> >> > --001636e0b39cc2a951046ca6ce68 Content-Type: text/html; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable I had used the following:

#+LATEX_HEADER:\addtolength{\itemsep}{-4pt= }

and, previously:

#+LATEX_HEADER:\setlength{\itemsep}{1pt}
Neither of them makes a difference.


Alan=A0 =
=A0



On Fri, Jun 19, 2009 at 8:18 AM, Alan E.= Davis <lngndvs@g= mail.com> wrote:
I can see now that the LaTeX source for my outline is not in list form, but= in sections.=A0=A0 When I reformat to use list notation in org, the follow= ing do not change anything in the pdf that is output.=A0 Interestingly, whe= n I export LaTeX into a buffer latex then complains about too many nested l= evels, while the pdf is exported ok.

Perhaps there is another length parameter I can change to make the outl= ines based on sectioning more compact.


Alan=A0

"Pollution is n= othing but the resources we are not harvesting. We allow them to disperse b= ecause we've been ignorant of their value."
=A0 --- Buckminster Fuller



= On Fri, Jun 19, 2009 at 8:02 AM, Alan E. Davis <lngndvs@gmail.com><= /span> wrote:
I need to print outlines in a more compact form than LaTeX lists ordinarily= provide.=A0 I often have used the paralist package, although it conflicts = with some other packages.=A0 How can I alter the line spacing for the lists= directly, for export?

I found this suggestion, and I was going to use #+LATEX_HEADER:, but th= en it occured to me that I don't have a way to specifiy that "my_e= numerate" would be used instead of "enumerate".

This is the code I found on line:

%
% this makes list spacing much better.
%
\newenvi=
ronment{my_enumerate}{
\begin{enumerate}
  \setlength{\itemsep}{1pt}<=
br>  \setlength{\parskip}{0pt}
  \setlength{\parsep}{0pt}}{\end{enumerat=
e}




}
Thank you for any suggestions.


A= lan Davis

"Pollution is nothing but the resources we are not h= arvesting. We allow them to disperse because we've been ignorant of the= ir value."
=A0 --- Buckminster Fuller



--001636e0b39cc2a951046ca6ce68-- --===============0961236983== Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline _______________________________________________ Emacs-orgmode mailing list Remember: use `Reply All' to send replies to the list. Emacs-orgmode@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/emacs-orgmode --===============0961236983==--