From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: "Alan E. Davis" Subject: Re: Change line spacing for lists for LaTeX export Date: Fri, 19 Jun 2009 08:18:15 +1000 Message-ID: <7bef1f890906181518v458ef9bboa8057500f51b3170@mail.gmail.com> References: <7bef1f890906181502p5557aae7o447b651729a2dacd@mail.gmail.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="===============0485140824==" Return-path: Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1MHPwP-0006J6-Vb for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Thu, 18 Jun 2009 18:18:42 -0400 Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1MHPwK-0006FA-Ig for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Thu, 18 Jun 2009 18:18:40 -0400 Received: from [199.232.76.173] (port=36295 helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1MHPwK-0006F3-CP for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Thu, 18 Jun 2009 18:18:36 -0400 Received: from mail-pz0-f198.google.com ([209.85.222.198]:62842) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1MHPwJ-0006TJ-SJ for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Thu, 18 Jun 2009 18:18:36 -0400 Received: by pzk36 with SMTP id 36so464274pzk.14 for ; Thu, 18 Jun 2009 15:18:35 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <7bef1f890906181502p5557aae7o447b651729a2dacd@mail.gmail.com> List-Id: "General discussions about Org-mode." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org To: org-mode --===============0485140824== Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=000e0cd2dec6ef3c9d046ca6c9b3 --000e0cd2dec6ef3c9d046ca6c9b3 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit I can see now that the LaTeX source for my outline is not in list form, but in sections. When I reformat to use list notation in org, the following do not change anything in the pdf that is output. Interestingly, when I export LaTeX into a buffer latex then complains about too many nested levels, while the pdf is exported ok. Perhaps there is another length parameter I can change to make the outlines based on sectioning more compact. Alan "Pollution is nothing but the resources we are not harvesting. We allow them to disperse because we've been ignorant of their value." --- Buckminster Fuller On Fri, Jun 19, 2009 at 8:02 AM, Alan E. Davis wrote: > I need to print outlines in a more compact form than LaTeX lists ordinarily > provide. I often have used the paralist package, although it conflicts with > some other packages. How can I alter the line spacing for the lists > directly, for export? > > I found this suggestion, and I was going to use #+LATEX_HEADER:, but then > it occured to me that I don't have a way to specifiy that "my_enumerate" > would be used instead of "enumerate". > > This is the code I found on line: > > % > % this makes list spacing much better. > % > \newenvironment{my_enumerate}{ > \begin{enumerate} > \setlength{\itemsep}{1pt} > \setlength{\parskip}{0pt} > \setlength{\parsep}{0pt}}{\end{enumerate} > > > } > > Thank you for any suggestions. > > > Alan Davis > > "Pollution is nothing but the resources we are not harvesting. We allow > them to disperse because we've been ignorant of their value." > --- Buckminster Fuller > > --000e0cd2dec6ef3c9d046ca6c9b3 Content-Type: text/html; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable I can see now that the LaTeX source for my outline is not in list form, but= in sections.=A0=A0 When I reformat to use list notation in org, the follow= ing do not change anything in the pdf that is output.=A0 Interestingly, whe= n I export LaTeX into a buffer latex then complains about too many nested l= evels, while the pdf is exported ok.

Perhaps there is another length parameter I can change to make the outl= ines based on sectioning more compact.


Alan=A0
"Pollution is nothing but the resources we are not harvesting. W= e allow them to disperse because we've been ignorant of their value.&qu= ot;
=A0 --- Buckminster Fuller



On Fri, Jun 19, 2009 at 8:02 AM, Alan E.= Davis <lngndvs@g= mail.com> wrote:
I need to print outlines in a more compact form than LaTeX lists ordinarily= provide.=A0 I often have used the paralist package, although it conflicts = with some other packages.=A0 How can I alter the line spacing for the lists= directly, for export?

I found this suggestion, and I was going to use #+LATEX_HEADER:, but th= en it occured to me that I don't have a way to specifiy that "my_e= numerate" would be used instead of "enumerate".

This is the code I found on line:

%
% this makes list spacing much better.
%
\newenvi=
ronment{my_enumerate}{
\begin{enumerate}
  \setlength{\itemsep}{1pt}<=
br>  \setlength{\parskip}{0pt}
  \setlength{\parsep}{0pt}}{\end{enumerat=
e}



}
Thank you for any suggestions.


A= lan Davis

"Pollution is nothing but the resources we are not h= arvesting. We allow them to disperse because we've been ignorant of the= ir value."
=A0 --- Buckminster Fuller


--000e0cd2dec6ef3c9d046ca6c9b3-- --===============0485140824== Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline _______________________________________________ Emacs-orgmode mailing list Remember: use `Reply All' to send replies to the list. Emacs-orgmode@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/emacs-orgmode --===============0485140824==--