What would happen then if one called remember from a previous remember
buffer, then saved it?

Alan Davis

"An inviscid theory of flow renders the screw useless, but the need for one
non-existent."                     ---Lord Raleigh (John William Strutt), or
else his son, who was also a scientist.

It is undesirable to believe a proposition when
there is no ground whatsoever for supposing it is true.
    ---- Bertrand Russell




On Wed, Mar 25, 2009 at 2:46 PM, Samuel Wales <samologist@gmail.com> wrote:

> On Tue, Mar 24, 2009 at 04:29, Carsten Dominik <dominik@science.uva.nl>
> wrote:
> >> After that,
> >>
> >> (when (plusp number)
> >>  (message "you have %s saved remember files" number))
> >
> > Hmmm.   When should this happen?  Not after a
> > successful remember process, I'd say.....
>
> The number will usually be zero, so that is when I would do it.  Of
> course it should be combined with "successfully saved to ...".
>
> I like it after rather than before saving because, in my view, we want
> to limit the amount of attention required between "have an idea" and
> "saved the idea".
>
> Perhaps there are other times for it, but then would work for me.
>
> --
> Myalgic encephalomyelitis denialism is causing death (decades early;
> Jason et al. 2006) and severe suffering (worse than nearly all other
> diseases studied; e.g. Schweitzer et al. 1995) and grossly corrupting
> science.  http://www.meactionuk.org.uk/What_Is_ME_What_Is_CFS.htm
>