From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: "Doyley, Marvin M." Subject: Re: real-time image rendering Date: Mon, 6 Oct 2014 19:12:56 +0000 Message-ID: <7A8EEB6A-E61A-4983-9E1F-A653471FA67F@ur.rochester.edu> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Return-path: Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:57830) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1XbDiV-0004MX-H5 for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Mon, 06 Oct 2014 15:13:16 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1XbDiN-0008St-RB for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Mon, 06 Oct 2014 15:13:07 -0400 Received: from mail-bn1bbn0102.outbound.protection.outlook.com ([157.56.111.102]:18560 helo=na01-bn1-obe.outbound.protection.outlook.com) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1XbDiN-0008S6-LZ for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Mon, 06 Oct 2014 15:12:59 -0400 Content-Language: en-US Content-ID: <35C6EC307A5E314584675513F81FF1D8@namprd07.prod.outlook.com> List-Id: "General discussions about Org-mode." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sender: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org To: "sva-news@mygooglest.com" Cc: "emacs-orgmode@gnu.org" I agree controlling the refresh rate make your approach better. Thanks, M > Why better? For which reason? > Why not this: > --8<---------------cut here---------------start------------->8--- > (add-hook 'org-babel-after-execute-hook > (lambda () > (org-display-inline-images nil t))) > ; more efficient with refresh =3D=3D = t --8<---------------cut here---------------end--------------->8--- ? Best regards, Seb --=20 Sebastien Vauban