From: Nick Dokos <nicholas.dokos@hp.com>
To: emacs-orgmode@gnu.org
Subject: Re: Annoying behavior of RET after a timestamp
Date: Tue, 29 May 2012 13:46:48 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <7863.1338313608@alphaville> (raw)
In-Reply-To: Message from Nick Dokos <nicholas.dokos@hp.com> of "Tue, 29 May 2012 13:24:20 EDT." <7321.1338312260@alphaville>
Nick Dokos <nicholas.dokos@hp.com> wrote:
> There was a recent commit 8c91f690a561113eee0d16cdb6e8afc6bcae2089 to
> follow a time stamp as a link. I have no problem with that but the code
> uses the org-at-timestamp-p function, which (perversely IMO) thinks that
> I am in a timestamp even when I'm right *after* the closing bracket; so
> pressing RET after inserting a time stamp follows the link, instead of
> inserting a newline. Since I do that fairly often, I find the behavior
> annoying.
>
> Can org-at-timestamp-p be taught the "correct" semantics? Or is this going
> to break something else?
>
I neglected to mention that I have org-return-follows-link set to t.
So, if org-at-timestamp-p cannot be retrained, then I'll have to retrain
myself to a) either insert something after the timestamp before RET or
b) use TAB, instead of RET, to follow links (and set/reset the variables
appropriately).
Be that as it may, however, org-at-timestamp-p's behavior just feels
wrong to me.
Nick
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2012-05-29 17:47 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 80+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2012-05-29 17:24 Annoying behavior of RET after a timestamp Nick Dokos
2012-05-29 17:46 ` Nick Dokos [this message]
2012-05-29 17:54 ` Samuel Wales
2012-05-29 18:43 ` Nick Dokos
2012-05-29 18:57 ` Samuel Wales
2012-05-29 19:04 ` suvayu ali
2012-05-29 19:15 ` Nick Dokos
2012-05-29 19:21 ` Nick Dokos
2012-05-29 19:26 ` Nick Dokos
2012-05-29 20:05 ` Samuel Wales
2012-05-31 12:43 ` Matt Lundin
2012-06-01 13:57 ` Bastien
2012-06-01 13:55 ` Bastien
2012-06-01 15:41 ` Nick Dokos
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2010-11-11 22:05 HTML export and blogging to blogger.com Samuel Wales
2010-11-11 22:50 ` Nick Dokos
2010-11-11 23:06 ` Samuel Wales
2010-11-12 3:45 ` Nick Dokos
2010-11-11 23:07 ` John Hendy
2010-11-11 23:18 ` Samuel Wales
2010-11-11 23:40 ` John Hendy
2010-11-12 2:25 ` Samuel Wales
2010-11-12 10:47 ` Eric S Fraga
2010-11-12 19:32 ` Samuel Wales
2010-11-14 1:25 ` Samuel Wales
2010-11-14 2:26 ` John Hendy
2010-11-14 2:54 ` Samuel Wales
2010-11-16 3:01 ` Samuel Wales
2010-11-16 9:50 ` Giovanni Ridolfi
2010-11-16 18:26 ` Samuel Wales
2010-11-16 23:17 ` Samuel Wales
2010-11-16 23:32 ` John Hendy
2010-11-17 0:13 ` Samuel Wales
2010-11-17 0:17 ` Samuel Wales
2010-11-17 4:34 ` John Hendy
2010-11-17 4:45 ` John Hendy
2010-11-17 9:09 ` Eric S Fraga
2010-11-17 16:36 ` John Hendy
2010-11-17 16:46 ` Eric S Fraga
2010-11-24 1:59 ` Samuel Wales
2010-11-24 9:09 ` Eric S Fraga
2010-11-24 2:03 ` Samuel Wales
2010-11-17 11:47 ` Christian Moe
2010-11-17 12:28 ` Add a hook with #+BIND? Christian Moe
2010-11-18 5:44 ` Re: HTML export and blogging to blogger.com John Hendy
2010-11-17 3:46 ` Nick Dokos
2010-11-17 4:18 ` John Hendy
2010-11-17 5:17 ` Nick Dokos
2010-11-17 5:52 ` Samuel Wales
2010-11-17 6:09 ` Nick Dokos
2010-11-24 2:00 ` Samuel Wales
2010-11-17 10:17 ` Tim Burt
2010-11-24 1:58 ` Samuel Wales
2009-06-11 11:58 tea-time? henry atting
2009-06-11 12:34 ` tea-time? Sebastian Rose
2009-07-17 3:56 ` tea-time? Samuel Wales
2009-07-17 7:24 ` tea-time? Bastien
2009-07-25 19:49 ` tea-time? Samuel Wales
2009-07-25 22:20 ` tea-time? Bastien
2009-07-26 0:14 ` tea-time? Samuel Wales
2009-07-26 19:04 ` tea-time? Bastien
2009-07-29 17:30 ` tea-time? Samuel Wales
2009-07-29 17:31 ` tea-time? Samuel Wales
2009-07-29 17:41 ` tea-time? Bastien
2009-07-29 17:54 ` tea-time? Samuel Wales
2009-07-29 18:41 ` tea-time? Bastien
2009-07-29 19:06 ` tea-time? Bastien
2009-07-29 21:45 ` tea-time? Samuel Wales
2009-07-29 22:29 ` tea-time? Nick Dokos
2009-07-30 5:18 ` tea-time? Bastien
2009-07-30 10:56 ` tea-time? Eric S Fraga
2009-07-30 12:34 ` tea-time? Richard Riley
2009-07-30 5:48 ` tea-time? Bastien
[not found] ` <samologist@gmail.com>
2012-08-28 1:11 ` How to make kill-sexp work as in the rest of Emacs? Samuel Wales
2012-08-28 3:43 ` Nick Dokos
2012-08-28 4:08 ` Samuel Wales
2012-08-28 5:30 ` Nick Dokos
2012-08-28 5:33 ` Samuel Wales
2012-08-30 5:04 ` Bastien
2009-07-17 12:46 ` tea-time? Bernt Hansen
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
List information: https://www.orgmode.org/
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=7863.1338313608@alphaville \
--to=nicholas.dokos@hp.com \
--cc=emacs-orgmode@gnu.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
Code repositories for project(s) associated with this public inbox
https://git.savannah.gnu.org/cgit/emacs/org-mode.git
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).