Mmh, what option do I have to use if I want to display the timestamp in a headline when exporting to html? Regards henry
On Mo, Jul 06 2009, henry atting wrote:
> Mmh, what option do I have to use if I want to display the timestamp in
> a headline when exporting to html?
Sorry, wrong question. What I really want to know is how to display the
timestamp in the *table of contents*. ;)
On Jul 6, 2009, at 1:10 PM, henry atting wrote: > On Mo, Jul 06 2009, henry atting wrote: > >> Mmh, what option do I have to use if I want to display the >> timestamp in >> a headline when exporting to html? > > Sorry, wrong question. What I really want to know is how to display > the > timestamp in the *table of contents*. ;) Hmmm, lets try to guess what the variable name might be..... something starting with "org-" something containing "stamp" something containing "toc" M-x apropos-variable RET org.*stamp.*toc.* RET http://www.pdsys.org/blog_files/WallE-Tada.mp3 :-) - Carsten
On Mo, Jul 06 2009, Carsten Dominik wrote:
> On Jul 6, 2009, at 1:10 PM, henry atting wrote:
>
>> On Mo, Jul 06 2009, henry atting wrote:
>>
>>> Mmh, what option do I have to use if I want to display the
>>> timestamp in
>>> a headline when exporting to html?
>>
>> Sorry, wrong question. What I really want to know is how to display
>> the
>> timestamp in the *table of contents*. ;)
>
> Hmmm, lets try to guess what the variable name might be.....
>
> something starting with "org-"
> something containing "stamp"
> something containing "toc"
>
>
> M-x apropos-variable RET org.*stamp.*toc.* RET
>
> http://www.pdsys.org/blog_files/WallE-Tada.mp3
Great, a riddle. And I solved it right away. Must be in good form, so
I'll go to the races as soon as possible.
Many thanks ;-)
henry
On Mo, Jul 06 2009, henry atting wrote:
> On Mo, Jul 06 2009, Carsten Dominik wrote:
>
>> On Jul 6, 2009, at 1:10 PM, henry atting wrote:
>>
>>> On Mo, Jul 06 2009, henry atting wrote:
>>>
>>>> Mmh, what option do I have to use if I want to display the
>>>> timestamp in
>>>> a headline when exporting to html?
>>>
>>> Sorry, wrong question. What I really want to know is how to display
>>> the
>>> timestamp in the *table of contents*. ;)
>>
>> Hmmm, lets try to guess what the variable name might be.....
>>
>> something starting with "org-"
>> something containing "stamp"
>> something containing "toc"
>>
>>
>> M-x apropos-variable RET org.*stamp.*toc.* RET
>>
>> http://www.pdsys.org/blog_files/WallE-Tada.mp3
>
> Great, a riddle. And I solved it right away. Must be in good form, so
> I'll go to the races as soon as possible.
I am afraid this is going to be my wonderfull
don't-ask-clearly-but-bit-by-bit-post...
In my feeling of elation of having solved the riddle I forgot to mention
that I am looking for a per-file solution, something that can be done
with #+OPTIONS: ...
On Jul 6, 2009, at 3:57 PM, henry atting wrote: > On Mo, Jul 06 2009, henry atting wrote: > >> On Mo, Jul 06 2009, Carsten Dominik wrote: >> >>> On Jul 6, 2009, at 1:10 PM, henry atting wrote: >>> >>>> On Mo, Jul 06 2009, henry atting wrote: >>>> >>>>> Mmh, what option do I have to use if I want to display the >>>>> timestamp in >>>>> a headline when exporting to html? >>>> >>>> Sorry, wrong question. What I really want to know is how to display >>>> the >>>> timestamp in the *table of contents*. ;) >>> >>> Hmmm, lets try to guess what the variable name might be..... >>> >>> something starting with "org-" >>> something containing "stamp" >>> something containing "toc" >>> >>> >>> M-x apropos-variable RET org.*stamp.*toc.* RET >>> >>> http://www.pdsys.org/blog_files/WallE-Tada.mp3 >> >> Great, a riddle. And I solved it right away. Must be in good form, so >> I'll go to the races as soon as possible. > > I am afraid this is going to be my wonderfull > don't-ask-clearly-but-bit-by-bit-post... > In my feeling of elation of having solved the riddle I forgot to > mention > that I am looking for a per-file solution, something that can be done > with #+OPTIONS: ... OK, there really has to be an end of what we add to the OPTIONS line with abbreviations for all kinds of things. Get the latest git version, and then use #+BIND: org-export-remove-timestamps-from-toc t This is a general mechanism that will work for any variable that should be bound to a special value during export, and that is not already covered by the #+OPTIONS or a similar line. - Carsten > > > _______________________________________________ > Emacs-orgmode mailing list > Remember: use `Reply All' to send replies to the list. > Emacs-orgmode@gnu.org > http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/emacs-orgmode
On Mo, Jul 06 2009, Carsten Dominik wrote: > On Jul 6, 2009, at 3:57 PM, henry atting wrote: > >> On Mo, Jul 06 2009, henry atting wrote: >> >>> On Mo, Jul 06 2009, Carsten Dominik wrote: >>> >>>> On Jul 6, 2009, at 1:10 PM, henry atting wrote: >>>> >>>>> On Mo, Jul 06 2009, henry atting wrote: >>>>> >>>>>> Mmh, what option do I have to use if I want to display the >>>>>> timestamp in >>>>>> a headline when exporting to html? >>>>> >>>>> Sorry, wrong question. What I really want to know is how to display >>>>> the >>>>> timestamp in the *table of contents*. ;) >>>> >>>> Hmmm, lets try to guess what the variable name might be..... >>>> >>>> something starting with "org-" >>>> something containing "stamp" >>>> something containing "toc" >>>> >>>> >>>> M-x apropos-variable RET org.*stamp.*toc.* RET >>>> >>>> http://www.pdsys.org/blog_files/WallE-Tada.mp3 >>> >>> Great, a riddle. And I solved it right away. Must be in good form, so >>> I'll go to the races as soon as possible. >> >> I am afraid this is going to be my wonderfull >> don't-ask-clearly-but-bit-by-bit-post... >> In my feeling of elation of having solved the riddle I forgot to >> mention >> that I am looking for a per-file solution, something that can be done >> with #+OPTIONS: ... > > OK, there really has to be an end of what we add to the OPTIONS line > with > abbreviations for all kinds of things. > > Get the latest git version, and then use > > #+BIND: org-export-remove-timestamps-from-toc t > > This is a general mechanism that will work for any variable that should > be bound to a special value during export, and that is not already > covered by the #+OPTIONS or a similar line. I don't adhere to #+OPTIONS; #+BIND is fine; thanks! henry -- http://literaturlatenight.de
Carsten Dominik <carsten.dominik@gmail.com> writes:
> On Jul 6, 2009, at 1:10 PM, henry atting wrote:
>
> Hmmm, lets try to guess what the variable name might be.....
>
> something starting with "org-"
> something containing "stamp"
> something containing "toc"
>
>
> M-x apropos-variable RET org.*stamp.*toc.* RET
>
> http://www.pdsys.org/blog_files/WallE-Tada.mp3
>
> :-)
Hmm the docstring for this variable feels backwards to me.
org-export-remove-timestamps-from-toc
If this is a boolean I'd think that if it's true then you are removing
the timestamps (ie it's a directive to remove timestamps from the toc)
but the docstring seems to be the reverse.
If nil, remove timestamps from the table of contents entries.
Just my 2 cents :)
-Bernt
Fixed, thanks.
- Carsten
On Jul 7, 2009, at 3:54 AM, Bernt Hansen wrote:
> Carsten Dominik <carsten.dominik@gmail.com> writes:
>
>> On Jul 6, 2009, at 1:10 PM, henry atting wrote:
>>
>> Hmmm, lets try to guess what the variable name might be.....
>>
>> something starting with "org-"
>> something containing "stamp"
>> something containing "toc"
>>
>>
>> M-x apropos-variable RET org.*stamp.*toc.* RET
>>
>> http://www.pdsys.org/blog_files/WallE-Tada.mp3
>>
>> :-)
>
> Hmm the docstring for this variable feels backwards to me.
>
> org-export-remove-timestamps-from-toc
>
> If this is a boolean I'd think that if it's true then you are removing
> the timestamps (ie it's a directive to remove timestamps from the toc)
>
> but the docstring seems to be the reverse.
>
> If nil, remove timestamps from the table of contents entries.
>
> Just my 2 cents :)
>
> -Bernt