From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Carsten Dominik Subject: Re: Re: [PATCH] Alphabetical ordered lists Date: Fri, 22 Oct 2010 10:13:50 +0200 Message-ID: <77953380-25FA-4510-B726-3212CE653AB3@gmail.com> References: <87bp8o498o.fsf@gollum.intra.norang.ca> <393C5110-E4D3-4B36-8F4E-4F94B5AA0F93@gmail.com> <87k4m876g3.wl%n.goaziou@gmail.com> <87iq1r7k00.wl%n.goaziou@gmail.com> <747F5104-6B1C-43E8-BF42-883287B7E303@gmail.com> <87aan0789y.wl%n.goaziou@gmail.com> <874od127wq.wl%n.goaziou@gmail.com> <535BC60F-1310-47AD-BCD1-1C88822B852A@gmail.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v936) Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed; delsp=yes Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: Received: from [140.186.70.92] (port=39102 helo=eggs.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1P9ClQ-00021q-BB for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Fri, 22 Oct 2010 04:14:17 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1P9ClJ-0000xd-FN for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Fri, 22 Oct 2010 04:14:11 -0400 Received: from mail-ew0-f41.google.com ([209.85.215.41]:42957) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1P9ClJ-0000xI-Ak for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Fri, 22 Oct 2010 04:14:05 -0400 Received: by ewy25 with SMTP id 25so296303ewy.0 for ; Fri, 22 Oct 2010 01:14:04 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: List-Id: "General discussions about Org-mode." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org To: Nathaniel Flath Cc: Bernt Hansen , Jacob Mitchell , org-mode List , Nicolas Goaziou Hi Nathaniel, I get "patch does not apply". Can you please update the patch to the current git master? Thanks - Carsten On Oct 22, 2010, at 7:30 AM, Nathaniel Flath wrote: > I think I've fixed the issues brought up with this new patch. Please > let me know what you think. > > On Wed, Oct 20, 2010 at 9:44 PM, Nathaniel Flath > wrote: >>> >>>> >>>> But I can't help thinking this could lead to unexpected results in >>>> some cases (admittedly less than when alpha bullets could be any >>>> size >>>> long). >>> >>> It definitely will. >>> >>> Here is an alternative idea. Nathaniel, what do you >>> think about this: We could keep the numbering as we >>> have it in the Org file, but introduce something like [@a] >>> in the first item that will convert the numbering >>> into a,b,... upon export to ASCII, HTML, maybe even LaTeX >>> (even though I think LaTeX demands some consistency here >>> and prefers to have the global setup decide how lists work). >>> Hell, we could even use [@A] for capitals and [@i] and [@I] >>> for roman numbering :) >>> >>> - Carsten >>> >> >> Sorry for the late response - got swamped with work for a bit. >> >> I'd much prefer the approach I've been going with, mostly since I >> don't usually export my notes and mostly view them in org-mode. I'll >> work on the patch tonight - should send a patch either later tonight >> or tomorow. >> >> Thanks, >> Nathaniel Flath >> > - Carsten