From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Carsten Dominik Subject: Re: unicorn image is not a link back to the front page on orgmode.org Date: Thu, 25 Jun 2009 17:10:18 +0200 Message-ID: <7336864B-960A-4116-B75A-6ED325A409D7@gmail.com> References: <487323a00906240639w1e4789ebjca5689decd03e795@mail.gmail.com> <87bpodirx8.fsf@bzg.ath.cx> <87y6rhh72x.fsf@bzg.ath.cx> <71454fac0906241117r337a565ey6cde3f6269c55094@mail.gmail.com> <87tz25h227.fsf@kassiopeya.MSHEIMNETZ> <877hz1bfe0.fsf@bzg.ath.cx> <87bpoch3fi.fsf@bzg.ath.cx> <87skhol75c.fsf@kassiopeya.MSHEIMNETZ> <6AAB5C90-C0F1-4395-BF2A-63358434A40B@gmail.com> <87my7wl5kp.fsf@gollum.intra.norang.ca> Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v935.3) Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1MJqb7-0004Kt-F2 for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Thu, 25 Jun 2009 11:10:45 -0400 Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1MJqb2-0004J4-Op for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Thu, 25 Jun 2009 11:10:45 -0400 Received: from [199.232.76.173] (port=60777 helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1MJqb2-0004Iz-Hp for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Thu, 25 Jun 2009 11:10:40 -0400 Received: from mail-ew0-f220.google.com ([209.85.219.220]:63366) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1MJqb2-00067r-49 for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Thu, 25 Jun 2009 11:10:40 -0400 Received: by ewy20 with SMTP id 20so226504ewy.42 for ; Thu, 25 Jun 2009 08:10:38 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <87my7wl5kp.fsf@gollum.intra.norang.ca> List-Id: "General discussions about Org-mode." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org To: Bernt Hansen Cc: Bastien , emacs-orgmode@gnu.org, James Yoo On Jun 25, 2009, at 5:02 PM, Bernt Hansen wrote: > Carsten Dominik writes: > >> On Jun 25, 2009, at 4:28 PM, Sebastian Rose wrote: >> >>> Bastien writes: >>>> Carsten Dominik writes: >>>> >>>>> What would be wrong with pulling the image out of the >>>>> background and making it directly clickable? >>>> >>>> None, I've done this. >> >> Great. I am also more comfortable with this because invisible >> clicking areas are notoriously used by fishing sites to make users >> believe they click one thing, and in fact they click another. >> >> At least this is how I interpret what I hear. Lets try to keep >> things transparent..... > ^^^^^^^^^^ > you mean opaque ;) Great catch! - Carsten > > It's the invisible clicky things that are the problem :) > > -Bernt >