From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Nick Dokos <nicholas.dokos@hp.com>
Subject: Re: Bibliographic references
Date: Fri, 16 Dec 2011 17:03:02 -0500
Message-ID: <7330.1324072982@alphaville.americas.hpqcorp.net>
References: <1324071794.3325.1@windy>
Reply-To: nicholas.dokos@hp.com
Return-path: <emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org>
Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([140.186.70.92]:41831)
	by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <nicholas.dokos@hp.com>) id 1Rbfs5-00084x-KR
	for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Fri, 16 Dec 2011 17:03:18 -0500
Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <nicholas.dokos@hp.com>) id 1Rbfs4-0000Xj-I8
	for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Fri, 16 Dec 2011 17:03:17 -0500
Received: from g6t0186.atlanta.hp.com ([15.193.32.63]:40801)
	by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <nicholas.dokos@hp.com>) id 1Rbfs4-0000UN-DM
	for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Fri, 16 Dec 2011 17:03:16 -0500
In-Reply-To: Message from Alan L Tyree <alantyree@gmail.com>
	of "Sat, 17 Dec 2011 08:43:14 +1100." <1324071794.3325.1@windy>
List-Id: "General discussions about Org-mode." <emacs-orgmode.gnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/options/emacs-orgmode>,
	<mailto:emacs-orgmode-request@gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/emacs-orgmode>
List-Post: <mailto:emacs-orgmode@gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:emacs-orgmode-request@gnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/emacs-orgmode>,
	<mailto:emacs-orgmode-request@gnu.org?subject=subscribe>
Errors-To: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org
Sender: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org
To: Alan L Tyree <alantyree@gmail.com>
Cc: nicholas.dokos@hp.com, emacs-orgmode@gnu.org

Alan L Tyree <alantyree@gmail.com> wrote:

> I feel like this should be googleable, but I'm not having much luck.
> 
> As Eric mentioned in a recent post, one of the nice things about 
> writing in org is that there is no need to worry about output format.
> 

He did say "mostly" I think...

> Except in one thing: How do I deal with bibliographic citations so that 
> the output is sensible in the different formats? How do I get \cite
> {key} to export properly in XHTML and odt as well as in LaTeX?
> 

... and I believe this is one area that is not covered by the "mostly"
umbrella :)

> Sorry if this is obvious to everybody else -- I'm stymied.
> 

I don't know of an answer either. I'd like to find out that I'm wrong.

Nick