From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Greg Minshall Subject: Re: babel awk with table input: Code block produced no output. Date: Sun, 05 Aug 2012 21:59:49 -0700 Message-ID: <73243.1344229189@gregair> References: Return-path: Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.92]:46807) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1SyFPz-00067x-3w for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Mon, 06 Aug 2012 00:59:51 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1SyFPy-0007Dm-6N for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Mon, 06 Aug 2012 00:59:51 -0400 Received: from relay02.pair.com ([209.68.5.16]:3303) by eggs.gnu.org with smtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1SyFPy-0007De-1R for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Mon, 06 Aug 2012 00:59:50 -0400 In-reply-to: Your message of "Sun, 05 Aug 2012 15:36:21 -1000." List-Id: "General discussions about Org-mode." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sender: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org To: "Thomas S. Dye" Cc: Org Mode Mailing List Tom, > :results output sounds right for awk as a report formatter. I'm > wondering if there is a need for :results value with awk? yes, i agree. i didn't get far enough into the code to see where the "value" result was coming from. cheers, Greg