From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Nick Dokos Subject: Re: Bug in latex export tutorial on worg ? Date: Mon, 09 May 2011 22:54:06 -0400 Message-ID: <7319.1304996046@alphaville.dokosmarshall.org> References: <4DC8A5C5.4050202@sift.info> Reply-To: nicholas.dokos@hp.com Return-path: Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([140.186.70.92]:41089) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1QJd5d-0006zP-P0 for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Mon, 09 May 2011 22:54:26 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1QJd5c-0002aU-2V for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Mon, 09 May 2011 22:54:25 -0400 Received: from vms173017pub.verizon.net ([206.46.173.17]:55809) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1QJd5b-0002aD-VZ for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Mon, 09 May 2011 22:54:24 -0400 Received: from alphaville.dokosmarshall.org ([unknown] [173.76.32.106]) by vms173017.mailsrvcs.net (Sun Java(tm) System Messaging Server 7u2-7.02 32bit (built Apr 16 2009)) with ESMTPA id <0LKY003LTLE6P5K0@vms173017.mailsrvcs.net> for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Mon, 09 May 2011 21:54:12 -0500 (CDT) In-reply-to: Message from Robert Goldman of "Mon, 09 May 2011 21:41:09 CDT." <4DC8A5C5.4050202@sift.info> List-Id: "General discussions about Org-mode." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sender: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org To: rpgoldman@sift.info Cc: nicholas.dokos@hp.com, Org Mode Robert Goldman wrote: > There is the following code block there: > > #+begin_src emacs-lisp :results silent > (add-to-list 'org-export-latex-classes > '("per-file-class" > "\\documentclass{scrartcl} > [NO-DEFAULT-PACKAGES] > [EXTRA]" > ("\\section{%s}" . "\\section*{%s}") > ("\\subsection{%s}" . "\\subsection*{%s}") > ("\\subsubsection{%s}" . "\\subsubsection*{%s}") > ("\\paragraph{%s}" . "\\paragraph*{%s}") > ("\\subparagraph{%s}" . "\\subparagraph*{%s}"))) > #+end_src > > Is this still correct? Or should this be :exports none instead of > :results silent? > ``:results silent'' works for me and keeps the result from appearing in the org buffer. I don't think :exports can do that - it can only affect what's exported. Nick