From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Nick Dokos Subject: Re: Using org-mode for laboratory notes. Date: Wed, 28 Nov 2012 17:01:17 -0500 Message-ID: <7318.1354140077@alphaville.americas.hpqcorp.net> References: <3EBF4F09D06D482C9F7BD50A74669FA8@gmail.com> <87a9wlalvs.fsf@gmx.com> Reply-To: nicholas.dokos@hp.com Return-path: Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.92]:53516) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Tdph8-0005k8-Ly for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Wed, 28 Nov 2012 17:01:27 -0500 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Tdph7-0008II-Ku for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Wed, 28 Nov 2012 17:01:26 -0500 Received: from g4t0017.houston.hp.com ([15.201.24.20]:29084) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Tdph7-0008Hk-Fz for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Wed, 28 Nov 2012 17:01:25 -0500 In-Reply-To: Message from Eric Lubeck of "Wed, 19 Sep 2012 20:18:13 PDT." List-Id: "General discussions about Org-mode." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sender: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org To: Eric Lubeck Cc: emacs-orgmode@gnu.org, Eric Schulte Eric Lubeck wrote: > On the broader point of organizing the notebook, I am still having a > bit of a dilemma coming up with an effective system. My first thought > was to just place all my work in a dated hierarchy, such as with > org-datetree. This would be simple and mirror a conventional > notebook, but would loose a lot of the logical hierarchy possible with > digital tools. This is off-topic for the group but it may be of some interest to the participants of this thread, if only as a comparison point: http://packages.python.org/Sumatra/ Nick