From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Nick Dokos Subject: Re: org-export-select-tags Date: Mon, 09 Jul 2012 18:13:14 -0400 Message-ID: <7268.1341871994@alphaville> References: <6745.1341869940@alphaville> Reply-To: nicholas.dokos@hp.com Return-path: Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.92]:41571) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1SoMCk-00027K-U9 for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Mon, 09 Jul 2012 18:13:20 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1SoMCj-0004fo-1p for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Mon, 09 Jul 2012 18:13:18 -0400 Received: from g6t0186.atlanta.hp.com ([15.193.32.63]:48874) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1SoMCi-0004fZ-U9 for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Mon, 09 Jul 2012 18:13:16 -0400 In-Reply-To: Message from SW of "Mon, 09 Jul 2012 21:49:16 -0000." List-Id: "General discussions about Org-mode." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sender: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org To: SW Cc: emacs-orgmode@gnu.org SW wrote: > SW gmail.com> writes: > > > That was my fault. I recall seeing other blank lines elsewhere in your > > example, so I must have deleted them all. Apologies for the confusion. > > I personally never have such blank lines in a document, so it was a > > force of habit. > > > Why *did* you start that example with a blank line anyway? That has been my habit since some very early bugs: see http://thread.gmane.org/gmane.emacs.orgmode/5285/focus=5417 Apparently the (old) latex exporter still shows symptoms of that disease. Note btw, that the buggy behavior is confined to the old exporter: the new exporter DTRT with or without the empty line. > > Having said that, I posted my example *without* the opening blank line many > times in this thread :) > But not originally: that's why I had to write and post my own and after you reported failures with mine, I didn't bother running yours. As an object lesson for all of us (we might as well get *something* positive out of this disaster :-) ): o post an ECM to begin with - no ifs, ands or buts. o post what you tested *exactly*. o test what you (or somebody else) posted *exactly* as it was posted. Nick