From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Nick Dokos Subject: Re: Re: 7.01 & Xemacs 21.4.22: decompose-region is not known Date: Mon, 25 Oct 2010 10:23:17 -0400 Message-ID: <7223.1288016597@gamaville.dokosmarshall.org> References: <87vd54hpam.fsf@gilgamesch.quim.ucm.es> <7z1v7rzm9l.fsf@vzell-de.de.oracle.com> <87aamfziqb.fsf@gilgamesch.quim.ucm.es> <87mxq3xzyq.fsf@mat.ucm.es> <8E4E71A2-A608-4250-87A5-B6EF8FDF2754@gmail.com> <44F769D5-C757-444D-82BB-60A12A5D06D7@gmail.com> <3C8ABC03-23DF-41EC-8B43-5ED722E410A8@gmail.com> <87sjzulgqk.fsf@gilgamesch.quim.ucm.es> <8739ru7dll.fsf@gilgamesch.quim.ucm.es> <87tyka5tdj.fsf@gilgamesch.quim.ucm.es> <3803.1288012880@gamaville.dokosmarshall.org> <87eibev0qq.fsf@gilgamesch.quim.ucm.es> <6984.1288016383@gamaville.dokosmarshall.org> Reply-To: nicholas.dokos@hp.com Return-path: Received: from [140.186.70.92] (port=47238 helo=eggs.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1PAOBN-0002e9-1H for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Mon, 25 Oct 2010 10:37:54 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1PANxZ-0005Ja-Fm for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Mon, 25 Oct 2010 10:23:38 -0400 Received: from vms173013pub.verizon.net ([206.46.173.13]:62848) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1PANxZ-0005JV-Co for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Mon, 25 Oct 2010 10:23:37 -0400 Received: from gamaville.dokosmarshall.org ([unknown] [173.76.32.106]) by vms173013.mailsrvcs.net (Sun Java(tm) System Messaging Server 7u2-7.02 32bit (built Apr 16 2009)) with ESMTPA id <0LAU005Q9NYTVGA0@vms173013.mailsrvcs.net> for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Mon, 25 Oct 2010 09:23:18 -0500 (CDT) In-reply-to: Message from Nick Dokos of "Mon, 25 Oct 2010 10:19:43 EDT." <6984.1288016383@gamaville.dokosmarshall.org> List-Id: "General discussions about Org-mode." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org To: nicholas.dokos@hp.com Cc: Uwe Brauer , Org-mode ml , Michael Sperber , Carsten Dominik Nick Dokos wrote: > > Overall, I think getting snapshot tarballs like this is more reliable; > but using git is much more efficient, both in terms of server resources > and in terms of efficient use of your time: if you are uploading a I meant: downloading > tarball more often than every month, you owe it to yourself to use git. Why is it so difficult to say what I mean? Nick