From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mp0 ([2001:41d0:2:4a6f::]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits)) by ms11 with LMTPS id iHxtHxwj1V6nCQAA0tVLHw (envelope-from ) for ; Mon, 01 Jun 2020 15:47:40 +0000 Received: from aspmx1.migadu.com ([2001:41d0:2:4a6f::]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits)) by mp0 with LMTPS id MDh3Gxwj1V7zQQAA1q6Kng (envelope-from ) for ; Mon, 01 Jun 2020 15:47:40 +0000 Received: from lists.gnu.org (lists.gnu.org [209.51.188.17]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by aspmx1.migadu.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id B73CF940253 for ; Mon, 1 Jun 2020 15:47:39 +0000 (UTC) Received: from localhost ([::1]:53164 helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1jfmf4-0008UM-NW for larch@yhetil.org; Mon, 01 Jun 2020 11:47:38 -0400 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:47100) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1jfmeQ-0008UF-Rq for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Mon, 01 Jun 2020 11:46:58 -0400 Received: from confino.investici.org ([212.103.72.250]:27281) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1jfmeP-0004Ea-II; Mon, 01 Jun 2020 11:46:58 -0400 Received: from mx1.investici.org (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by confino.investici.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8822F21022; Mon, 1 Jun 2020 15:46:53 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=anche.no; s=stigmate; t=1591026413; bh=w6UN7+CPB/CMOKQSnD2Izmmn8K9UOzEXF9NDPW6ysh0=; h=Subject:To:Cc:References:From:Date:In-Reply-To:From; b=CbDjARe642rQlnIpi8Qv0AbcuW8uLJFmFSPi+wwFvukuDrPL/gYE5YNMn2rAGAk3p bBRsLHeMRdPvfPpL8V+32vFJnmkWasvbgoZg8fM7lk62u6S/UvimvNQEv/e/Ljjtig yCcf5HQcm4m9dJ3UlL3tz+aQNhDVxM9ZNhbQ0U5o= Received: from [212.103.72.250] (mx1.investici.org [212.103.72.250]) (Authenticated sender: mariotomo@inventati.org) by localhost (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 51C7720FFD; Mon, 1 Jun 2020 15:46:52 +0000 (UTC) Subject: Re: issue tracker? To: Bastien References: <87ftbw3mvw.fsf@alphaville.usersys.redhat.com> <6ffc8465-fdeb-4981-8303-43f09e26e0c1@www.fastmail.com> <20200519073352.GC7874@tuxteam.de> <08ee796b-d541-69f3-518e-f577d9b29f0b@anche.no> <87imgau9ny.fsf@gnu.org> From: Mario Frasca Message-ID: <71f5fa9a-8f55-6869-151a-209f53f86579@anche.no> Date: Mon, 1 Jun 2020 10:46:41 -0500 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:68.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/68.8.1 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <87imgau9ny.fsf@gnu.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Content-Language: en-US Received-SPF: pass client-ip=212.103.72.250; envelope-from=mario@anche.no; helo=confino.investici.org X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: First seen = 2020/06/01 11:46:53 X-ACL-Warn: Detected OS = Linux 2.2.x-3.x [generic] X-Spam_score_int: -20 X-Spam_score: -2.1 X-Spam_bar: -- X-Spam_report: (-2.1 / 5.0 requ) BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H3=0.001, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL=0.001, SPF_HELO_PASS=-0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001 autolearn=_AUTOLEARN X-Spam_action: no action X-BeenThere: emacs-orgmode@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.23 Precedence: list List-Id: "General discussions about Org-mode." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Cc: emacs-orgmode@gnu.org Errors-To: emacs-orgmode-bounces+larch=yhetil.org@gnu.org Sender: "Emacs-orgmode" X-Scanner: scn0 Authentication-Results: aspmx1.migadu.com; dkim=pass header.d=anche.no header.s=stigmate header.b=CbDjARe6; dmarc=none; spf=pass (aspmx1.migadu.com: domain of emacs-orgmode-bounces@gnu.org designates 209.51.188.17 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=emacs-orgmode-bounces@gnu.org X-Spam-Score: -0.21 X-TUID: QNkUy4nwrK/8 Hi Bastien, in the meanwhile someone found the patch, and we are working on it. thank you for the feedback! but it stays confusing, and sure I get the point, people here are volunteers, working on their free time, but precisely for this reason it would be better if we could rely on some more focused / focusing tool for working on patches. while working on my contribution, I'm also reading the code I'm adding to, and I am tempted to perform unrelated edits, like correcting a docstring to a function that does something, just not quite what the docstring says, or refactoring stuff in order to add missing unit tests, but that way my patch would not focus on the task of adding this small piece of functionality. it's several unrelated edits, and if we were to do this via email, it would cost all of us so much time, that I think I'll better leave it. ciao, best regards, MF On 01/06/2020 09:45, Bastien wrote: > Hi Mario, > > Mario Frasca writes: > >> myself, I recently posted a patch, received zero reaction, and have >> the impression it's now lost in the logs of this mailing list.  indeed >> pretty inefficient! > Sorry for that. > > As others have mentioned, Org developers are working on their free > time to help others, fix bugs and keep Org alive. > > If you think your patch got lost and should be considered, please > revive the thread. > > Thanks, >