From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Carsten Dominik Subject: Re: Minor nit - LaTeX header contents and footnotes Date: Tue, 16 Feb 2010 05:53:25 +0100 Message-ID: <700CEFE0-B665-4CB9-AED7-3B6A24DFA1BB@gmail.com> References: <10739.1250802859@alphaville.usa.hp.com> <7493B34F-8E52-41D1-A230-FB65CF3678B2@gmail.com> <87y6iy1j91.wl%ucecesf@ucl.ac.uk> Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v936) Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed; delsp=yes Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1NhFRB-0001Pz-To for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Mon, 15 Feb 2010 23:53:29 -0500 Received: from [140.186.70.92] (port=60181 helo=eggs.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1NhFRB-0001PQ-Aa for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Mon, 15 Feb 2010 23:53:29 -0500 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1NhFRA-0004bv-R7 for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Mon, 15 Feb 2010 23:53:29 -0500 Received: from mail-ew0-f228.google.com ([209.85.219.228]:34087) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1NhFRA-0004bM-ML for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Mon, 15 Feb 2010 23:53:28 -0500 Received: by mail-ew0-f228.google.com with SMTP id 28so988715ewy.8 for ; Mon, 15 Feb 2010 20:53:28 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: List-Id: "General discussions about Org-mode." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org To: Ruud Brekelmans Cc: emacs-orgmode@gnu.org On Feb 13, 2010, at 2:54 PM, Ruud Brekelmans wrote: > > This doesn't solve the problem directly but putting spaces around > the 1 works: > > --8<---------------cut here---------------start------------->8--- > #+BEGIN_LaTeX > \newcommand{\norm}[ 1 ]{\lVert#1\rVert} > #+END_LaTeX > --8<---------------cut here---------------end--------------->8--- > > (and also works with the header version). > > Yes, it's not a big deal, but the header version doesn't have this > problem anymore. Yes, this kind of code belongs into the header, I think, most of the time. Still, I have improved this situation, your example above no longer causes the bracket to be interpreted as a footnote. - Carsten