From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Peter Davis Subject: Re: Can't email multipart/alternative anymore Date: Fri, 23 Oct 2015 07:55:29 -0400 Message-ID: <6sw6c7pp05g5ou.fsf@pfdstudio.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Return-path: Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:47592) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1ZpawZ-0000Fi-66 for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Fri, 23 Oct 2015 07:55:36 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1ZpawV-0001h5-M3 for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Fri, 23 Oct 2015 07:55:34 -0400 Received: from out1-smtp.messagingengine.com ([66.111.4.25]:45736) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1ZpawV-0001gb-HU for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Fri, 23 Oct 2015 07:55:31 -0400 Received: from compute3.internal (compute3.nyi.internal [10.202.2.43]) by mailout.nyi.internal (Postfix) with ESMTP id B6DA1206AF for ; Fri, 23 Oct 2015 07:55:30 -0400 (EDT) List-Id: "General discussions about Org-mode." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sender: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org To: Rasmus Cc: emacs-orgmode@gnu.org, mail@nicolasgoaziou.fr Rasmus writes: > Hi Peter, > > Thanks for your report. > > Peter Davis writes: > >> I just tried running org-mime-org-buffer-htmlize, which I have used >> successfully in the past. However, this time, I got an empty >> message buffer, and this in the mini-buffer: >> >> org-export-barf-if-invalid-backend: Unknown "nil" back-end: Aborting exp= ort >> >> Any clues? I haven't used this in a couple of months, but it did work >> at one time and, as far as I know, I haven't changed anything >> that should impact this. > > This is from the "draft mode" introduced by Nicolas recently. > > Perhaps to get your work done for now you can try to change > org-export-with-broken-links, though I doubt it will work in this > particular case. > > Nicolas will fix this when he=E2=80=99s back, I=E2=80=99m sure. I haven= =E2=80=99t studied the > "barf code" and I will therefore not attempt to fix it. Thank you, Rasmus, but I haven't updated anything lately, so I don't think = it's the result of any org changes. -pd