From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Carsten Dominik Subject: Re: Minor colouring (font lock) annoyance Date: Tue, 5 May 2009 10:33:47 +0200 Message-ID: <6DA3F031-770E-49EA-92A4-96967DF4EFE2@gmail.com> References: <87skjyrl9r.fsf@gollum.intra.norang.ca> <87bpqlsylg.fsf@gollum.intra.norang.ca> <877i19sy5o.fsf@gollum.intra.norang.ca> Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v930.3) Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1M1G69-0000jE-D1 for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Tue, 05 May 2009 04:33:57 -0400 Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1M1G64-0000aq-4x for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Tue, 05 May 2009 04:33:56 -0400 Received: from [199.232.76.173] (port=39935 helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1M1G63-0000aa-V5 for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Tue, 05 May 2009 04:33:51 -0400 Received: from mail-ew0-f162.google.com ([209.85.219.162]:52140) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1M1G63-0001OK-Pf for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Tue, 05 May 2009 04:33:51 -0400 Received: by ewy6 with SMTP id 6so4879445ewy.42 for ; Tue, 05 May 2009 01:33:50 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <877i19sy5o.fsf@gollum.intra.norang.ca> List-Id: "General discussions about Org-mode." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org To: Bernt Hansen Cc: emacs-orgmode@gnu.org On Apr 24, 2009, at 8:29 PM, Bernt Hansen wrote: > Carsten Dominik writes: > >> On Apr 24, 2009, at 8:20 PM, Bernt Hansen wrote: >> >>> Carsten Dominik writes: >>> >>>> I do not actively color these tasks, but any headlines that >>>> have been *visible* in a window will have been fontified, >>>> others will not have bee fontified. Org just copies the >>>> text for this list. Maybe I should make then all without >>>> colors? >>> >>> Okay. That's a perfect explanation for me -- and I'll just ignore >>> that >>> color or lack of colour issue. It's actually a lot easier to read >>> coloured than not so please don't bother making them all black. :) >> >> I can also actively give them a color. Should these be the correct >> level colors, or some particular color? > > The actual level colours with highlighted TODO keywords and other > cookies would be ideal I think. This should work now, please verify. - Carsten