From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Carsten Dominik Subject: Re: Re: Publishing clocked time Date: Fri, 11 Sep 2009 05:50:46 +0200 Message-ID: <69C11869-C34B-4E8D-B3C7-24BECC04EBA8@gmail.com> References: <566e527b0909040832v2dd07dadm89168f8aaedea3d2@mail.gmail.com> <877hwabwdf.fsf@mundaneum.com> <20090907155600.GC18897@thinkpad.adamsinfoserv.com> <566e527b0909090047p17eeeee5h4c87faf4bba2c3fe@mail.gmail.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v936) Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1Mlx9z-0005Su-Hf for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Thu, 10 Sep 2009 23:50:55 -0400 Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1Mlx9v-0005Qa-9y for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Thu, 10 Sep 2009 23:50:55 -0400 Received: from [199.232.76.173] (port=35144 helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1Mlx9u-0005Q1-BB for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Thu, 10 Sep 2009 23:50:50 -0400 Received: from mail-ew0-f211.google.com ([209.85.219.211]:60054) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1Mlx9t-0006TR-V6 for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Thu, 10 Sep 2009 23:50:50 -0400 Received: by ewy7 with SMTP id 7so698996ewy.31 for ; Thu, 10 Sep 2009 20:50:49 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <566e527b0909090047p17eeeee5h4c87faf4bba2c3fe@mail.gmail.com> List-Id: "General discussions about Org-mode." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org To: Ivan Chernetsky Cc: emacs-orgmode@gnu.org On Sep 9, 2009, at 9:47 AM, Ivan Chernetsky wrote: >> Actually on this topic, I'd like to be able to make a simple table of >> all time itemized by day. > > I am definitely subscribing to it. Also it would be wonderful if there > will be an option to include a table with tasks that was done or was > being done, by day. IMHO, such options allow to use org-mode at work > more freely and effectively. Same here. WIthout an example, nothing actionable here. > > By the way, are there any means of extensibility of publishing, not > touching the source code of org-mode? If no, what are plans about it > in the near future? What do you mean??? - Carsten