From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Giovanni Ridolfi Subject: Re: Re: [PATCH] indentation for section headings vs bulleted lists Date: Mon, 21 Feb 2011 10:59:25 +0000 (GMT) Message-ID: <679836.41858.qm@web28306.mail.ukl.yahoo.com> References: <20110221010437.GA30336@aether.rnxn4ps> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Return-path: Received: from [140.186.70.92] (port=50996 helo=eggs.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1PrTUM-0001C8-3K for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Mon, 21 Feb 2011 05:59:35 -0500 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1PrTUH-0003dw-3P for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Mon, 21 Feb 2011 05:59:34 -0500 Received: from nm12.bullet.mail.ukl.yahoo.com ([217.146.183.186]:22024) by eggs.gnu.org with smtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1PrTUG-0003dd-BU for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Mon, 21 Feb 2011 05:59:29 -0500 In-Reply-To: <20110221010437.GA30336@aether.rnxn4ps> List-Id: "General discussions about Org-mode." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org To: Nicolas , Linus Arver , Carsten Dominik Cc: emacs-orgmode@gnu.org --- Lun 21/2/11, Linus Arver ha scritto:=0A> Da: Lin= us Arver Luned=EC 21 febbraio 2011, 01:04=0A> On Mon= , Feb 21, 2011 at 12:26:30AM=0A> +0100, Nicolas wrote:=0A> > Hello,=0A> > = =0A> > Here is an attempt to solve the problem at hand.=0A> > =0A> > Linus,= would you mind testing it and reporting back?=0A> > =0A> =0A> Brilliant, I= just applied your patch to the git version and=0A> everything works nicel= y as I had hoped!=0A=0AIn Linus's example file there was no heading, I thin= k this is =0A*not* a "regular example".=0A=0A------------------------- fil= e from Linus ----=0A#+STARTUP: indent=0A=0A- asd fas fdsf sdf sdfasdf sadf = sadf =0A - asd fas fdsf sdf sdfasdf sadf sad=0A=0A* asd fas fdsf sdf sdfas= df sadf sadf =0A** asd fas fdsf sdf sdfasdf sadf sadf dasf df df dsf dsf sd= f ds fds d fdf dsaf dsf dsf dsf df=0A--------------------------------------= --------------------=0A=0AThe manual states: " Within an entry of the outli= ne tree,".=0A=0ANicolas, does this constrain still apply with the 'new' =0A= way of handling lists?=0A=0Acheers,=0AGiovanni=0A=0A=0A