From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: "Thomas S. Dye" Subject: Re: Re: One org file, multiple exports, is it possible? Date: Tue, 25 May 2010 07:53:47 -1000 Message-ID: <66FC3F4F-DFAE-4D2B-A95D-1A05B9558B1F@tsdye.com> References: <855B9DE3-A7FD-42B4-A863-DE036065EBD1@gmail.com> <6B0AFD3C-BF59-4DB6-823F-471107A380F4@tsdye.com> <81206149-B01D-4837-A7A5-0ABF94920FE1@gmail.com> <56FE52EC-18B8-46FE-B0B8-266DE70E0A38@tsdye.com> <646DB2B5-DFE0-422F-BD11-AA2117E76644@tsdye.com> <87632cljw4.fsf@gollum.intra.norang.ca> <2A73C8FD-9901-4C69-B02F-967198004270@tsdye.com> <4BFC082C.3060201@comcast.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v936) Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed; delsp=yes Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: Received: from [140.186.70.92] (port=34589 helo=eggs.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1OGyKA-0006tF-JT for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Tue, 25 May 2010 13:53:55 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1OGyK9-0005SM-9P for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Tue, 25 May 2010 13:53:54 -0400 Received: from oproxy1-pub.bluehost.com ([66.147.249.253]:51597 helo=outbound-mail-359.bluehost.com) by eggs.gnu.org with smtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1OGyK9-0005S7-0T for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Tue, 25 May 2010 13:53:53 -0400 In-Reply-To: <4BFC082C.3060201@comcast.net> List-Id: "General discussions about Org-mode." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org To: Mark Elston Cc: emacs-orgmode@gnu.org Thanks Mark, That's evocative. Now I'm off to see how I let those bits rot. All the best, Tom On May 25, 2010, at 7:26 AM, Mark Elston wrote: > On 5/25/2010 9:20 AM, Thomas S. Dye wrote: >> Thanks Bernt, >> >> So, "broken custom settings" appear to be the cause of the unexpected >> behavior. Two questions: >> >> 1) Do programmers have a name for this situation, where custom >> settings >> seemed to work perfectly for a long time but then failed noticeably >> with >> the introduction of new, correct code into the .emacs? > > Well, in an organization I used to work at we called it 'bit rot' > though it wasn't necessarily about Emacs ... :) > > Mark > > _______________________________________________ > Emacs-orgmode mailing list > Please use `Reply All' to send replies to the list. > Emacs-orgmode@gnu.org > http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/emacs-orgmode