From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Nick Dokos Subject: Re: Timestamp: Forward or backward by a week Date: Tue, 15 May 2012 14:35:58 -0400 Message-ID: <6619.1337106958@alphaville> References: <3306.1337090863@alphaville> <5556.1337100409@alphaville> <874nrhpaud.fsf@mean.albasani.net> Reply-To: nicholas.dokos@hp.com Return-path: Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.92]:48063) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1SUMbN-0007oC-Iq for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Tue, 15 May 2012 14:36:10 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1SUMbK-0007HU-At for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Tue, 15 May 2012 14:36:04 -0400 Received: from g1t0029.austin.hp.com ([15.216.28.36]:18996) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1SUMbK-0007Gy-5Y for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Tue, 15 May 2012 14:36:02 -0400 In-Reply-To: Message from Memnon Anon of "Tue, 15 May 2012 18:21:29 -0000." <874nrhpaud.fsf@mean.albasani.net> List-Id: "General discussions about Org-mode." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sender: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org To: Memnon Anon Cc: emacs-orgmode@gnu.org Memnon Anon wrote: > Nick Dokos writes: > > > But I saw a message implying that Debian does not consider emacs > > documentation free (!?!?), so the info files may be in > > emacs23-common-non-dfsg in this case. > > The FSF isn't the only one caring about "Freedom". > Where more than one entity exists, they are bound to disagree sometimes :). > > > ,----[ https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/DFSG#GFDL ] > | Much documentation written by the GNU Project, the Linux Documentation > | Project and others licensed under the GNU Free Documentation License > | contain invariant sections, which do not comply with the DFSG. This > | assertion is the end result of a long discussion and the General > | Resolution 2006-001.[11] > | > | Due to the GFDL invariant sections, content under this license must be > | separately contained in an additional "non-free" repository which is not > | officially considered part of Debian. > `---- > Yup - as I indicated, I found it somewhat surprising, so I found and read the resolution. I think it's all pretty small nits, but thank goodness IANAL (haven't even played one on TV): the havoc that I could wreak would be unimaginable... Nick